|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi,
I?m new in here but I absolutely agree with them - it?s a shame to let the
users fall like a hot potato that made Omega rich...
They should develop TS6 equal to TS2000i except the differences for
order-routing so that updates could be used for both platforms!
Have a nice day,
Ft_007
On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, 8:12:54 PM, grehert@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
gyc> Andrew asked me if I would be willing to solicit from this group
gyc> a list of the biggest gripes about the functionality of TS6, and
gyc> pass it on to him.
This sounds like what happened with TS3, Ts4, etc. They ask for inputs
and the vast majority end up in a black hole. I wasted a LOT of time
on this before with almost nothing to show for it.
Biggest complaint: Ts2k is still *very* buggy. Fix that, and we'll
consider talking.
ztrader
ribau@xxxxxxxx:
ah ha, confession time...number one, you gotta put it on a satellite, then
you gotta put it with a company we can trust...don't bother to ask, I won't
waste my time with this crap...Andrew couldn't even be bothered to respond
when I asked him about the double tool bars in TS2Ki, Pierre let us all
down, who can believe you guys...by the way, where are those service packs
for TS2Ki? you want credibility, finish TS2Ki!
>>Wizards,
>>
>>I just got off the phone with Andrew Jones, senior developer for TS6. We
>>were discussing some of the inherent limitations of TS6, and why most of the
>>power users of TS2000i balk at the idea of switching to TS6. I've been
>>playing around with TS6 in a trial account just to compare it with 2000i.
>>Andrew asked me if I would be willing to solicit from this group a list of
>>the biggest gripes about the functionality of TS6, and pass it on to him.
>>Please feel to give me some inputs that I can pass on to him. What kind of
>>functionality do you need to see in order to find TS6 attractive, etc.
|