|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Sorry, but Mark Brown speaks the truth here.. For too
long TASC has said what its advertisers paid them to
say. TASC was never interested in the truth. I have
had multiple letters-to-the editor rejected simply
because my comments conflicted with article content (I
was right and the article content was wrong, but TASC
would not hear it).
-RNM
--- Thomas Alexander <alexander_enterprises@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Whoa Nellie! Re-leash the dogs of war. Lassie's gone
> over
> to the Dark Side of the Force.
>
> Other than a few hardcore emails I have written in
> my less
> than glorious past, I would say this is one of the
> most
> acerbic emails I've read. While I appreciate your
> candor,
> straightforwardness and efforts, the angry, negative
> tone
> and lack of substantiation and detail was painful
> and
> detracted from the value of your input in my
> reading.
>
> I must be very green indeed to still enjoy reading
> TASC,
> Active Trader and Futures magazines. And though I
> was born
> at night, it was not last night so I know to take
> what I
> read with a grain of salt. (I was a writer/content
> provider/marketing copy person and salt merchant for
> years
> myself.) Yet, what you are suggesting sounds more
> like a
> Gobi-desert-salt-flats conspiracy than a "grain of
> salt."
>
> Keeping gentle-flower newbies like myself in mind,
> would
> you be so kind as to provide informative and helpful
> details of what you are talking about, sans the
> photon
> torpedoes and unsolicited kidney extractions :)
>
> I don't mean to stir up trouble but I just know that
> in all
> of that vendetta you are trying to be helpful and I
> always
> appreciate the help!
>
> Thank you Mark for your input and thank you John for
> not
> calling in Charlie's Angels to kick some trader
> bootie :)
>
> Thomas "The Smiling Buddhist Softy with a Pony Tail"
> Alexander
>
> --- Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello John,
> >
> > i was wondering why "NOW" you would come out
> of the
> > closet and say
> > something about your former meal ticket "omega
> and or
> > billy cruz".
> > after looking at some of the stock and commodities
> > magazines that keep
> > piling up in the corner of my office (from my
> paid
> > subscription) i
> > decided to dust one off and have a look. now
> guess
> > what? no cruz
> > advertising of any kind? i see no wonder you
> have
> > pulled your head
> > out of the sand or where ever else it was stuck.
> >
> > i see some brilliant new magazine has now
> taken s&c's
> > place as the
> > premier trading resource. i guess those
> that try
> > and be more
> > ethical win out in the end, it just takes time and
> your
> > magazines time
> > has come.
> >
> > you have the guts to ask for new articles and
> trading
> > systems in your
> > feb. 2001 - Opening Position on page 6! i have
> done
> > more for you rag
> > just now by posting this that all your paid
> advertisers
> > combined.
> >
> > in fact you have just lit a fire under me to
> write more
> > articles for
> > that other magazine that is kicking your butt all
> the way
> > to the bank.
> > what sunk your mag was your lack of morals
> when it
> > came to selling
> > your subscribers down the river. you crossed
> the
> > line and now you
> > have burnt your bridge with your clients on
> it. the
> > only reason i
> > still take your mag is to witness its further
> decay.
> > maybe you could
> > get all those celebrities you and omega created in
> the
> > past like
> > Tom DaFake, Linda Lovelace, Jake Snake, Joe
> > Krustyfinger, Mark Crook
> > and others. not to mention the guy "i
> wrote the
> > book on market
> > wizards" and therefore i are one now. yea
> right.
> > maybe these folks
> > could now chip in and bail you out.
> >
> > JSSC> Wrong again, Marko! We never review
> something until
> > it's been released.
> >
> > evidently even after it was released, the reviews
> were
> > better
> > according to the vendors advertising size and
> commitment.
> > rather than
> > if the product was any good or not.
> >
> > you know for a fact that your whole staff refused
> to put
> > their name or
> > names on the ts2000i review when it first came
> out.
> > why? because
> > they were paid to lie, thats why. you are still
> being
> > paid to lie.
> >
> > look at the robert krause saga in s&c. the
> magazine
> > practically was
> > owned by him for a while and even tom hartle
> declared
> > that krause was
> > his guru and mentor! everywhere you looked it was
> krause
> > this and
> > krause that. and low (very low) and behold tom
> winds
> > up leaving his
> > position as editor (head misleader) and goes to
> work for
> > krause.
> >
> > wonder who we will see heavily promoted in s&c
> soon
> > in the future?
> > you can bet whoever they are its your future
> employer.
> >
> > JSSC> jj
> >
> > Have a Great Day, Mark
> >
>
>
|