[EquisMetaStock Group] Re: MS 11 Pro with ZIGZAG in indicators

["thomas12ng" <thomas12ng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Anyone in this forum can speak up as long as the argument is making sense or they can come up with a solid evidence regardless their status. 

:)

--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "mr. bryan mccormick" <deepfoobar@xxx> wrote:
>
> Wow. Well if this is true, I am not sure what use they could be. A zig-zag is a backward looking indicator. As many people have written in the past, not the least of them Jose Silva, systems based on zig-zag will give nonsense results because of this backwards look. I am not sure if Jose is still active. Perhaps I have this wrong. He would be the correct person to comment.
> 
> --- On Tue, 11/24/09, joo seng <jooseng6@xxx> wrote:
> 
> From: joo seng <jooseng6@xxx>
> Subject: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: MS 11 Pro with ZIGZAG in indicators
> To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 1:00 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>     
>       
>       
>       All "MS11-Adaptive xxx" indicators using Cycle method are based on zig zag.
> 
> --- On Wed, 25/11/09, superfragalist <no_reply@xxxxxxxxxx s.com> wrote:
> 
> From: superfragalist <no_reply@xxxxxxxxxx s.com>
> Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: MS 11 Pro with ZIGZAG in indicators
> To: equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Wednesday, 25 November, 2009, 1:19 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>       
>       
>       I've looked at the formula's for most of the indicators and I don't recall any of them being based on zig zag formulas. Maybe I missed one. 
> 
> 
> 
> They have prev statements in them which slow them down to the point where they have limited use, especially on intraday charts, but that's about it. 
> 
> 
> 
> How an adaptive indicator performs is based on what it is adapting too? Volatility, moving averages, money flow, etc. There are many ways to program adaptive indicators. 
> 
> 
> 
> Super
> 
> 
> 
> --- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, "thomas12ng" <thomas12ng@ ...> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> > 
> 
> > I am surprise that the recent development in metastock 11 is somewhat twisted. 
> 
> > 
> 
> > After reviewing the indicator builder components (where all names  start  with MS11 ; they must contain ZIGZAG parameter as their proprietary arrangement. ) I feel sad about this set back. Mainly with the indicator quality. I have monitored a few hypothetical porfolio which system build based on these compenent vs. my own indicator from a reliable "adaptive" indicator. The result is totally very very bad.
> 
> > 
> 
> > I truly have no idea who was the genius author behind these repaint indicator. 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > Just a quick suggestion: to those who try to develop system as based on MS11 custom indicator just abandon it!!!
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>      
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         New Email names for you!  
> 
> Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail.
> 
> Hurry before someone else does!
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/