[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

TRe: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: adjusted moving avs



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Both Jurik and Tillson live in Colorado.  Both have low lag moving averages.  One cost a lot of money and the other is free.  Each trader must decide where the "real value" lies.
 
Take care,
 
Steve


From: rvalue1 <rvalue1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 8:01:56 AM
Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: adjusted moving avs

Yes, Mark Jurik has some nice products; but take a look at the
cost. It is an expensive subsciption.

Rvalue1
--- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, Code 2 <Code2@xxx> wrote:
>
> Mark Jurik's JMA is a very nice low-lag moving average with little
> overshoot. See http://www.jurikres .com/catalog/ ms_ama.htm# top
>
>
>
> From: pumrysh <no_reply@xxxxxxxxxx s.com>
> To: equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 10:20:18 AM
> Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: adjusted moving avs
>
> Hi Pat,
>
> The problem with any moving average is the lag that is introduced
when
> you begin manipulating them. So the question then is are you
really
> improving them? There is a formula out there that was discussed
several
> years ago at:
> http://finance. groups.yahoo. com/group/ equismetastock/ message/23694
>
> I'm not aware of any that restrict the advance/decline by a
percentage
> or points...seems that would defeat their purpose.
>
> Another thought is an adaptive moving average which is set to a
small
> lookback period at the beginning of a trend then adjust to longer
> lookbacks as the trend progresses based on an indicator value.
There
> are DLL's in the files section that will help you with this task.
>
> Preston
>
>
>
>
> --- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, "Patrick Butler" <pat494@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Our old friends moving averages do a good job and are generally
> useful. However to improve them and their forecasting ability, is
it
> possible to negate their larger than normal swings up and down ? A
> spike of more than X points or a percentage perhaps ? Perhaps
there is
> a formula already out there somewhere ? Jurik may have done
something
> along these lines.
> > Thanks
> > Pat
> --
>




__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___