|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot reply to this message via email because you have chosen not
to disclose your email address to the group.
To reply: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/post?act=reply&messageNum=5932
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had encountered with the same problem... And tried to use different
period of RSI, but nothing changed... Thoughed that this is a
bug...And stopped using RSI on explorer... Same bug found on all
versions of MS between v.6.5 and 7.2..
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mike Loveday
<mike.loveday@xxxx> wrote:
> Has anyone come across this before? In creating a simple formula to
> report on crosses above 30 of a 14 period RSI, I find the values
> reported in the explorer report columns to be anywhere between 5%
and
> 20-30% lower than those of the same indicator visually placed on
the
> chart.
>
> In one case, the explorer report says '25' and '49' for two most
recent
> periods yet the same indicator applied to the chart has '41'
and '57'.
>
> To check that the indicator formula and the explorer formula were
> indeed mathematically the same, i have reprogrammed both using
> Ron's "Relative Strength Index - Custom V" formula from KALOSZ.
>
> I still report differences between the chart indicator and the
explorer
> results to the same degrees above.
>
> Is this a computational limit of Metastock or something much more
> obvious?
>
> thanks, Mike
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|