[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Matrix Forecasting



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hi Lionel

Sorry ... slip of the key. I meant inexpensive not expensive. The 3D graphs
are quite impressive. You can even put multiple 3D graphs in a graph.

I don't know if these charts were produced on MathCAD but check out the 3
axis contour graphs on page 44 to 46 to see charts that are very effective
in trade analysis.
 http://www.activetradermag.com/backissues/0700/july2000.pdf

Best regards

Walter

----- Original Message -----
From: W Lake <wlake@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: Matrix Forecasting


> Hi Lionel
>
> MathCAD and Excel are highly integrated both for data transfer and for
drag
> and drop of objects. They work extremely well together. MS, Excel and
> MathCAD form an excellent analysis combination.
>
> Mathematica needs a special add-on to access Excel data. It is a high
> powered program for pure math and statistics.
>
> Excel has the capability to do arrays which is not the same as matrix
math,
> i.e., linear algebra. Workbooks exist that are designed to solve matrices.
> Various functions can be purchased in xla form to do linear algebra, but
the
> plain Excel 2000 out of the book will not do matrix math. Why bother when
> MathCAD is so powerful.
>
> Re graphics ... 2D histograms for example look a little flat in comparison
> to 3D histograms. Check around for an expensive copy ... it's worth the
> digging effort.
>
> Best regards
>
> Walter
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Matrix Forecasting
>
>
> > Walter:
> > Thanks for bringing this article to my attention.
> > Are you saying that MathCAD interfaces better with Excel than Mathmatica
> or
> > that it is cheaper and adequate?
> > I was surprised to hear that Excel doesn't have built in matrix
utilities.
> > You are correct on this.
> > Excel graphing features are very good and easy to use. I'm using Excel
> 2000
> > and I am impressed with its capabilities.
> >
> > Thanks again.
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "W Lake" <wlake@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:32 AM
> > Subject: Matrix Forecasting
> >
> >
> > > The recent article in the Aug 2001 Futures Mag on Matrix Forecasting
> uses
> > > matrix math.
> > >
> > > The linear algebra can be solved quickly in Mathcad. Although it's
easy
> to
> > > do the Linear algebra in Mathematica, the Excel to Mathematica links
> cost
> > > extra whereas the importing of single files or a "live" link between
> Excel
> > > and Mathcad is very quick and easy. The graphing capability in Mathcad
> is
> > > more 'exciting' and is what you usually see in trader's mags.
> > >
> > > Most of the available mcd files on the web are Mathcad 6 or 7 and are
> > easily
> > > readable by later versions. My version 2000 pro reads them fine so you
> > > should have no trouble with 2001. Student versions are available quite
> > > inexpensively ... mcd "readers" also appear to be available.
> > >
> > > Matrix work looks like a more natural extension to the MS - XL cluster
> of
> > > programs than neural nets.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Walter
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>