|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> How is TradeStation superior? From what I have heard, many are
> unhappy with TradeStation due to the poor support, difficulty with
> "Easy Language", and moving to an online platform.
Others here can comment more knowledgeably than I, but the key
factor for me is the programming language itself -- it's more powerful
and flexible. Chuck LeBeau's chandelier exit, for example, is five lines
of EasyLanguage code, whereas my equivalent in MetaStock is 12
lines with a bunch of nested PREV statements. Don't get me wrong,
though; I think MetaStock is the superior application overall and
Equis is the better company to work with.
----- Original Message -----
From: "neo" <neo1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:20 AM
Subject: TradeStation
> Glen
>
> No one else demonstrated it but when I called support they confirmed the
> problem. It was my mistake and theirs.
>
> How is TradeStation superior? From what I have heard, many are unhappy with
> TradeStation due to the poor support, difficulty with "Easy Language", and
> moving to an online platform.
>
> neo
>
>
> ~ -----Original Message-----
> ~ From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ~ [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Glen Wallace
> ~ Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:44 AM
> ~ To: MetaStock listserver
> ~ Subject: Re: System Tester
> ~
> ~ I was simply unable to duplicate the System Tester errors
> ~ you noted last week. Was anyone else able to duplicate it?
> ~
> ~ For more advanced system testing, TradeStation is the
> ~ standard.
> ~
> ~
> ~
> ~ ----- Original Message -----
> ~ From: neo
> ~ To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ~ Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 5:11 PM
> ~ Subject: System Tester
> ~
> ~ Because of the major flaws in MetaStock's System Tester,
> ~ does anyone know of another System Tester Program that
> ~ will work with MetaStock data and hopefully use the same
> ~ programming language?
> ~
> ~ neo
|