|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Guys
Thanks for the many responses.
This is incredible. Last night when I ran PLdot, only the lightest line
would plot as dots, the heavier weights would plot as a jagged line. After
getting all these posts, I retried and it works as it is supposed to. The
lightest weight is now invisible, and all the heavier weight lines except
the last show up nicely.
It must be all the positive vibes you were sending my way.
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "John R" <jrdrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: PLdot
> Lionel,
>
> Use the very last Style in drop down list. Weight setting works with this
in
> V7.03 at least.
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:21 PM
> Subject: Re: PLdot
>
>
> > In Metastock you can plot different line styles in only the lightest
> weight
> > line. Anything heavier than this comes out as a solid line. The dot plot
> > comes out as a raggedy line when I try heavier weights.
> >
> > The excuse I got from tech support was just that, a very weak excuse.
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John R" <jrdrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: PLdot
> >
> >
> > > Use Style & Weight under indicator properties (right click on
indicator
> > > plot).
> > >
> > > Use the last style in drop down list together with a fairly heavy
weight
> > to
> > > make dots more easily visible.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:04 PM
> > > Subject: Re: PLdot
> > >
> > >
> > > > Adam:
> > > > How can I plot the dots on a chart?
> > > > Lionel Issen
> > > > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Adam Hefner" <vonhef@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:01 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: PLdot
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The PLdot is one of the many tools that Charles Drummond
> (Drummond
> > > > > Geometry) teaches. It is beyond the scope of my time on this forum
> to
> > > > > properly
> > > > > explain its usage. I have attached a MetaStock chart showing how
the
> > > PLdot
> > > > > can
> > > > > be used to determine if a market is trending or in
congestion....but
> > it
> > > > has
> > > > > other uses
> > > > > also.
> > > > > Adam Hefner
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Dan" <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:38 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: PLdot
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > What do you look for with it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adam Hefner wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The PLdot is a 3 bar average of what MetaStock calls the
> > "Typical
> > > > > Price".
> > > > > > > The Typical price is simply the days (High+Low+Close) /3,
> > > > > > > So it could be written As Follows
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sum(Ref(Typical(),-1),3),3)
> > > > > > > Do I use it? Yes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adam Hefner
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Hengy" <hengy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:49 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: PLdot
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Has anyone heard of the PLdot? It is the average of the
high,
> > low
> > > > and
> > > > > > > close
> > > > > > > > for the past three bars. This is what I've come up with.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ((H+L+C)/3)+((HHVBars(H,2)+
> > > > > LLVBars(L,2)+(CLOSE -2))/3)+((HHVBars(H,3)+
> > > > > > > > LLVBars(L,3) +(CLOSE,-3))/3)/3. Has anyone tried setting it
> up
> > or
> > > > > using
> > > > > > > it?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
|