|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR DISTRIBUTION LIST
WONDER@xxxxxxxxxxxx
THANK YOU
metastock-digest-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Subject:
>
> metastock-digest Digest Volume 97 : Issue 176
>
> Today's Topics:
> Return of Metastock 6.0
> Re: OBTR indicator
> MS formulas to Excel
> Divergance
> Mutual funds
> Superpostion stoch
> RE: Countback Lines
> Re: Physical Chemistry
> Re: Deflation????
> Bid/Ask Spread
> RE: New User Question re. MS to Excel
> Re: MS formulas to Excel
> Re: MS formulas to Excel
> RE: Countback Lines
> RE: New User Question re. MS to Excel
> Re: Bid/Ask Spread
> Disk Crash
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Return of Metastock 6.0
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 13:03:32 -0500
> From: Donaald Brown <uwvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I would like to return the Metastock 6.0 for windows I had purchased
> from your company three to four weeks ago. I have found that I am to
> inexperienced to use a program that is so advanced as yours. Pleases
> e-mail me with the information that I need so that I may expidite the
> return of the product.
>
> Thank-You
>
> Donald Brown
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: OBTR indicator
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 13:05:42 -0500 (CDT)
> From: rickyp <rickyp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: winfield@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Tue, 12 Aug 1997 winfield@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > unsubscribe metastock-list
> >
>
> you are now unsubscribed from the metastock list.
>
> please note it may take up to a year for messages to quit arriving.
>
> _../|_
> ='__ _~-.
> \' ~-`\._
> |/~`
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> _.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._.`(._
> . rick pendrick i am a poor freezingly cold soul, .
> . 5302 32nd avenue so far from where i intend to go. .
> . kenosha, wi 53144 trudging through life's very constant lows, .
> . 414-652-5912 so far from where i'm determined to go. .
> . .
> . mailto:rickyp@xxxxxxxxxx "seasick, yet still docked" .
> . http://www.execpc.com/~rickyp - morrissey .
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: MS formulas to Excel
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 13:15:13 -0500
> From: Efrain R Portales <efrain12@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Metastock List <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi gang,
> This may sound very simple ( simplistic? ) but, is there a way
> to copy custom formulas from MS 6 to Excel 7?.
> If you copy from MS and paste into Excel, a formula is dumped
> into a single column. For long formulas ( like mine ), it's
> very tedious and time-consuming to rearrange ten or fifteen
> cells into one. As all of us know, in Excel a command is
> executed from a single cell, so an MS formula HAS to be in
> one single cell.
> Why am I doing this?. Because of the Equis' limitation of
> 1024 characters per custom indicator. I was told they're
> going to increase this to at least 2048 ( thank God ! ).
> Thanks for any help/comment.
> Good trading !.
>
> Efrain
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Divergance
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 98 11:38:58 UT
> From: "J LEWIN" <TOWER_DENE_EDU@xxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of a formula that will tell you if a market has diverged
> against an indicator. I'm typically refering to Stochastics/RSI divergances
> and other typical indicators.
>
> Essentially what I'm after is something that mechanises the divergance when
> adding trendlines to a chart. I know one can do it for a specific period ie 10
> days but most divergances occur over the course of varying time scales.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'll swap some ideas if you really
> want!
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruce.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Mutual funds
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 14:07:25
> From: "Harley Meyer" <Harley.D.Meyer-2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Although the DOW closed up on Monday I had moved everything in our mutuals
> funds to money market account.
> Harley Meyer
> meyer093@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Superpostion stoch
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 23:17:13
> From: "Harley Meyer" <Harley.D.Meyer-2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: lissen@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Sat, 09 Aug 1997 18:08:58 -0500,
> Lionel Issen wrote...
> >Harley:
> >
> The superposition stochastics is below:
>
> (Stoch(2,2) + Stoch(3,3) + Stoch(4,4) + Stoch(5,5) + Stoch(6,6) + Stoch(7,7)
> + Stoch(10,10))/7
>
> The Jarvis factor is something I had come up with that has been very helpfull
> in giving numbers to work with during the day. It came from the idea of solving
> for your buy/sell and then shifting it forward one time period. This way I
> can see if my signal is triggered the day of and not the evening of. Any
> indicator that can be solved algebraically to give you a number for your
> buy/sell signal and then shifted forward one time period would be a Jarvis
> class indicator.
>
> Currently I haven't been giving out the formula. The above idea is actually
> more valuable than my formula. Because with the idea-you can figure it out for
> yourself. Just like I had too.
>
> Harley Meyer
> meyer093@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: RE: Countback Lines
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 14:19:30 -0600
> From: Metastock List <MetastockList@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Andrew,
>
> Try these two formulas and let us know if this is what you mean. Plot
> them directly on the price bars.
>
> Countback up trend
>
> ValueWhen(1,C > Ref(C,-2) AND
> C > Ref(C,-1) AND
> Ref(L,-2) < Ref(L,-1) AND Ref(L,-1) < L,Ref(L,-2))
>
> Countback down trend
>
> ValueWhen(1,C < Ref(C,-2) AND
> C < Ref(C,-1) AND
> Ref(H,-2) > Ref(H,-1) AND Ref(H,-1) > H,Ref(H,-2))
>
> Equis Support
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew J. Kornberg [SMTP:kornberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 8:59 AM
> > To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Daryl Guppy
> > Subject: Countback Lines
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I posted this a couple of weeks ago but unfortunately I did not get a
> > reply. Can anyone out there help with Countback Lines?
> >
> > Some charting programs now do this automatically (Ezy Charts) and I
> > wonder
> > whether this can be done efficiently and fairly automatically in
> > Metastock.
> >
> > Essentially the principle behind countback lines is that they provide
> > a
> > short term resistance or support line. They are constructed as
> > follows
> > (From Daryl Guppy's Tutorials in Applied Technical Analysis
> > www.ozemail.com.au/~guppy/). (I recommend this site to everyone)
> >
> > "In a falling trend, one counts back two higher highs and then
> > projecting a
> > horizontal line to the right. A close above this resistance suggests
> > that
> > the trend has changed. In a rising trend, it is calculated by
> > counting
> > back two lower lows. A close below this support line suggests that
> > the
> > trend has changed. The countback line can be used to fine tune entry
> > and
> > exit points."
> >
> > Obviously, this can be done by hand but they may need to be
> > recalculated
> > and redrawn daily. Is there a way for Metastock to do this
> > automatically
> > or semiautomatically? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Another question where the answer has so far escaped me. If one was
> > to
> > pick an exploration and get a report with say a list of 100 stocks.
> > Can
> > one then run another exploration on those stocks only?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > __
> > Andrew J. Kornberg
> > Department of Neurology
> > Royal Children's Hospital
> > Melbourne, Australia 3052
> >
> > email: kornberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Phone: + 61 3-9345 5661
> > Fax: + 61 3-9345 5977
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > __
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Physical Chemistry
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 20:25:11 GMT
> From: gordon@xxxxxxxxxxx (Guy Gordon)
> To: Wooglinx@xxxxxxx
> CC: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:50:34 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>
> >Will the person who posted the note to Michael Robb and who has the PhD in
> >Physical Chemistry contact me. I have the note but no name or e-mail address.
> >I'm interested in you approach to the market. (We might also exchange views
> >on "Boundary Layer Theory".)
>
> That was probably me, but I no next to nothing about Boundary Layer
> Theory. Couldn't we discuss Quantum Theory instead?
> :-)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Deflation????
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 19:11:08 -0500
> From: Robert Doeden <bdoeden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Greatelto@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Bob Doeden recently wrote...."I would like to have it
> explained to my why we
> will have
> deflation when there are more & more people chasing fewer &
> fewer resources."
>
> The possiblity of deflation exists because so much of the
> excess liquidity
> that has been avaialble has found its way into capital
> investment. This
> expansion in capital investment has greatly exceeded
> consumer consumption.
> So currently we have excess capacity and weak pricing (look
> at the auto
> industry rebates). Consumer borrowing is slowing reflecting
> less demand.
> This basically says that inflation is not a problem....but
> deflation could
> be.
>
> Recently I read a report that stated that capital surplus
> available for
> investment has risen about twice as much as consumer
> consumption since the
> early 1990's. And that gap in still rising rapidly. With
> the consumer
> generally chin-deep in debt and the growth in debt slowing,
> consumer demand
> could well weaken more than expected. If that happens, with
> excess capacity
> in our industries, pricing could get much weaker. That is
> how deflation
> could come about.
>
> This is not a die-hard prediction on my part. I merely
> wanted to engage in a
> discussion about its possibility. But so few people out
> there picked up on
> it that I now believe it might well be a very good
> contrarian view. We
> should watch out for it....
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> Jerry
>
> Been mulling over your reply. Today John Bollinger made his usual
> Tuesday afternoon appearance on CNBC (he comes on between 14:30-15:00
> central time on Tuesdays.) I have watched him for a number of years
> and highly respect his opinions. (Why CNBC kept John Murphy instead
> of Bollinger I'll never know. Murphy is very good at telling you
> about the technical aspects of a move after it has taken place.
> Bollinger sticks his neck out and forecasts a movement.)
>
> Anyway, Bollinger is more concerned about deflation than inflation.
> He didn't explain the reasons for his concern except for stating that
> producers are having to make a greater effort to sell goods that they
> did in times past which agrees with your comment about excess
> production facilities.
>
> I believe CNBC's economist, Bill Wolman (who I like to listen to in
> spite of the fact he is over 40)(don't know how he stays on CNBC whose
> hiring criteria is in the order of Photogenic, Under 40, with Brains
> last) also is concerned about deflation.
>
> So you have a couple of heavyweights in your corner. Your comments
> about excess capital investment in production facilities I'll buy.
> The Japanese have flooded the world with money which has tended to go
> overseas rather than stay in Japan.
>
> There are two things that still bother me about this deflation
> forecast:
>
> 1) The world has a growing population that is looking for the better
> life while the earth's resources are finite.
> 2) What happens when Japan starts clamping down on the liquidity they
> are creating.
>
> Maybe we will have a short term period of deflation until excess
> production capacity is eleiminated and then inflation will start
> again. In most commodities there is a rather fine line between
> overcapacity and shortages.
>
> In closing I want to thank you for a thoughtful reply. I know that
> some in this forum are disturbed that we don't keep strictly to
> questions on MS. I personally like the level of discourse here. Get
> some good ideas for investing and after all that is the goal of using
> MS.
>
> Bob Doeden
> Chicago
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Bid/Ask Spread
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 97 22:32:45 UT
> From: "Wolf Kettler" <wolf_1@xxxxxxx>
> To: "MetaStock List (E-mail)" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is a rather silly question but I am trading on the London Stock Exchange
> currently, and I don't know: Is there no Bid/Ask spread on NASDAQ???
>
> Thanks,
> Wolf
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: RE: New User Question re. MS to Excel
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 18:49:00 -0800
> From: Mark <bearcub@xxxxxxx>
> To: "'Metastock List'" <Metastock-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Tuesday, August 12, 1997 7:06 AM, Metastock
> List[SMTP:MetastockList@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
>
> >As far as "read only" Master and Emaster files, that usually happens
> >when you exit MetaStock for Windows abnormally. Are there files in the
>
> ha-ha good joke - "when you exit MetaStock . . . abnormally." Better to say
> when MetaStock exits abnormally, as the only time Metastock seems to exit
> abnormally is when it does so on it's own. :)
>
> >data folder that begin with a ~? Those are what is left when an
> >abnormal termination occurs. If you start MetaStock of The DownLoader,
> >it will tell you that you are still using the files and when you OK you
> >will have access to the data.
> >
> >Equis Support
>
> I have been manually deleting the ~ files because I continue to get
> abnormal terminations and the manual deletes were the only thing that got
> me going again. Is there any danger in going about this manual directory
> cleanup?
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=
> - Mark D. Enzenberger
> = bearcub@xxxxxxx
> - http:\\www.alaska.net\~bearcub\
> =Time is the best teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its students.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: MS formulas to Excel
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 23:25:01 -0500
> From: kandersen4@xxxxxxxx (Ken Andersen)
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Efrain,
>
> I've not had this problem using the Indicator Builder, but I have maxed
> out the 1024 character limit in the System Tester. This sometimes
> happens while I'm writing a formula for an exit (close long), and have
> to include the entire Enter Long formula...sometimes several times.
> Rather than use Excel, what I do is pick an obvious place (AND; OR; <;
> >,....), and the break the formula into two parts. Then I create a new
> custom "indicator" by pasting the first half into the Indicator
> Builder, naming it something appropriate like "exit formula, part 'A'
> ", ...create a second new "indicator" by pasting in the second half and
> naming it "exit formula,
> part 'B' ".
>
> ...anyway, instead of using 1024+ characters, now all I gotta to do write
> something like:
>
> Low < Highestsince(1, FML( " long exit formula, part 'A' ") AND
> FML( " long exit formula, part 'B' ") , REF(mov(c,18,e),-1).
>
> You ought to be able to do the same thing with your indicator...you could
> even name it
> "fantastically long indicator formula, part 'A' " and "fantastically
> long indicator formula, part 'B' " <g>
>
> good luck.
>
> Ken
>
> On Tue, 12 Aug 1997 13:15:13 -0500 Efrain R Portales
> <efrain12@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >Hi gang,
> >This may sound very simple ( simplistic? ) but, is there a way
> >to copy custom formulas from MS 6 to Excel 7?.
> >If you copy from MS and paste into Excel, a formula is dumped
> >into a single column. For long formulas ( like mine ), it's
> >very tedious and time-consuming to rearrange ten or fifteen
> >cells into one. As all of us know, in Excel a command is
> >executed from a single cell, so an MS formula HAS to be in
> >one single cell.
> >Why am I doing this?. Because of the Equis' limitation of
> >1024 characters per custom indicator. I was told they're
> >going to increase this to at least 2048 ( thank God ! ).
> >Thanks for any help/comment.
> >Good trading !.
> >
> >Efrain
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: MS formulas to Excel
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:39:27 -0500
> From: kandersen4@xxxxxxxx (Ken Andersen)
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Efrain,
>
> I wrote:
>
> > naming it something appropriate like
> >"exit formula, part 'A' ", ...create a second new "indicator" by
> >pasting in the second half and naming it "exit formula,
> > part 'B' ".
>
> "Exit" is not an appropriate name for this example. A better name might
> be "xyz formula, part A". Or maybe "xyz enter long formula part A".
> ...who knows. It's late.
>
> ken
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: RE: Countback Lines
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 07:25:02 -0700
> From: Peter Lim <peterl@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi Equis,
>
> The formulae you have given do not work in Metastock 5.11. Could you please
> post the correct or modified formuale for Metastock version 5.11, please?
>
> Equis, on behalf of the many faithful users of Metastock 5.11 who haven't
> migrated to version 6.0 ,thanks for the help.
>
> Peter Lim
>
> ============================================================================
> ===
>
> At 02:19 PM 8/12/97 -0600, you wrote:
> >Andrew,
> >
> >Try these two formulas and let us know if this is what you mean. Plot
> >them directly on the price bars.
> >
> >Countback up trend
> >
> >ValueWhen(1,C > Ref(C,-2) AND
> >C > Ref(C,-1) AND
> >Ref(L,-2) < Ref(L,-1) AND Ref(L,-1) < L,Ref(L,-2))
> >
> >Countback down trend
> >
> >ValueWhen(1,C < Ref(C,-2) AND
> >C < Ref(C,-1) AND
> >Ref(H,-2) > Ref(H,-1) AND Ref(H,-1) > H,Ref(H,-2))
> >
> >Equis Support
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew J. Kornberg [SMTP:kornberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 8:59 AM
> >> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Daryl Guppy
> >> Subject: Countback Lines
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I posted this a couple of weeks ago but unfortunately I did not get a
> >> reply. Can anyone out there help with Countback Lines?
> >>
> >> Some charting programs now do this automatically (Ezy Charts) and I
> >> wonder
> >> whether this can be done efficiently and fairly automatically in
> >> Metastock.
> >>
> >> Essentially the principle behind countback lines is that they provide
> >> a
> >> short term resistance or support line. They are constructed as
> >> follows
> >> (From Daryl Guppy's Tutorials in Applied Technical Analysis
> >> www.ozemail.com.au/~guppy/). (I recommend this site to everyone)
> >>
> >> "In a falling trend, one counts back two higher highs and then
> >> projecting a
> >> horizontal line to the right. A close above this resistance suggests
> >> that
> >> the trend has changed. In a rising trend, it is calculated by
> >> counting
> >> back two lower lows. A close below this support line suggests that
> >> the
> >> trend has changed. The countback line can be used to fine tune entry
> >> and
> >> exit points."
> >>
> >> Obviously, this can be done by hand but they may need to be
> >> recalculated
> >> and redrawn daily. Is there a way for Metastock to do this
> >> automatically
> >> or semiautomatically? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> Another question where the answer has so far escaped me. If one was
> >> to
> >> pick an exploration and get a report with say a list of 100 stocks.
> >> Can
> >> one then run another exploration on those stocks only?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> __
> >> Andrew J. Kornberg
> >> Department of Neurology
> >> Royal Children's Hospital
> >> Melbourne, Australia 3052
> >>
> >> email: kornberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Phone: + 61 3-9345 5661
> >> Fax: + 61 3-9345 5977
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> __
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: RE: New User Question re. MS to Excel
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 08:05:56 -0600
> From: Metastock List <MetastockList@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You should not need to manually delete these files. Starting the
> program again should take care of them.
>
> If you seem to be incurring a large number of abnormal terminations, you
> might want to contact us for help in solving whatever is causing them.
> You can call us or write us at support@xxxxxxxxx with details.
>
> Equis Support
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark [SMTP:bearcub@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 1997 7:58 AM
> > To: 'Metastock List'
> > Subject: RE: New User Question re. MS to Excel
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 12, 1997 7:06 AM, Metastock
> > List[SMTP:MetastockList@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> >
> > >As far as "read only" Master and Emaster files, that usually happens
> > >when you exit MetaStock for Windows abnormally. Are there files in
> > the
> >
> > ha-ha good joke - "when you exit MetaStock . . . abnormally." Better
> > to say
> > when MetaStock exits abnormally, as the only time Metastock seems to
> > exit
> > abnormally is when it does so on it's own. :)
> >
> > >data folder that begin with a ~? Those are what is left when an
> > >abnormal termination occurs. If you start MetaStock of The
> > DownLoader,
> > >it will tell you that you are still using the files and when you OK
> > you
> > >will have access to the data.
> > >
> > >Equis Support
> >
> > I have been manually deleting the ~ files because I continue to get
> > abnormal terminations and the manual deletes were the only thing that
> > got
> > me going again. Is there any danger in going about this manual
> > directory
> > cleanup?
> >
> >
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > =-
> > =-=-=-=
> > - Mark D. Enzenberger
> > = bearcub@xxxxxxx
> > - http:\\www.alaska.net\~bearcub\
> > =Time is the best teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its students.
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > =-
> > =-=-=-=
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Bid/Ask Spread
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 09:19:37 -0500
> From: "Peter Timaratz" <timaratz@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Wolf Kettler" <wolf_1@xxxxxxx>,
> "MetaStock List (E-mail)" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There certainly is.
>
> ----------
> From: Wolf Kettler <wolf_1@xxxxxxx>
> To: MetaStock List (E-mail) <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Bid/Ask Spread
> Date: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 5:32 PM
>
> This is a rather silly question but I am trading on the London Stock
> Exchange
> currently, and I don't know: Is there no Bid/Ask spread on NASDAQ???
>
> Thanks,
> Wolf
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Disk Crash
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 10:50:16 -0400
> From: "Jim Greening" <JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Metastock List" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> All,
> A million thanks for everyone who responded to my request for any of
> my old messages on MetaStock System Tests and Explorations or Telescan
> Prosearches. Your response was terrific. I think I've gotten them all
> several times over <G>.
> I've got all of my MetaStock database rebuilt, but still need to
> construct the trend channels and run the tests on most of the stocks. I
> should be done by this week end. Yes, I am backing up on my new ZIP drive
> as I go <G>.
> Jim
|