|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>Date: Fri, 04 Jul 1997 17:51:50
>To: sail4@xxxxxxxx (Richard C. Fredette)
>From: Stan Rubenstein <stansan@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Windows 95
>Cc: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Richard, I did the 3.1 --> 95 upgrade last Sept('96)
>after installing a new CD-ROM drive.
>I had a lot of CD-ROM drive problems but the WIN95
>upgrade went smoothly, as long as you made note of
>your current video driver because WIN95 will ask you
>to confirm that before install. After WIN95 installed
>I revised my configuration several times and WIN95
>Configuration wizard picked everything up.
>I have a mixture of 16 bit and 32 bit applications, some 4 years
>old from different vendors.None were affected by the upgrade
>and all were able to work except for one communication app
>where the vendor wrote the app in such a way it could not run
>on other than 3.1.
>So my experience with WIN95 upgrade was a pleasure and a happy
>surprise. Now I wouldn't do without it. Lots of crash recovery
>built in WIN95 and no more resource problems as I had with 3.1
>However I installed MS 6 after WIN95 upgrade, naturally since it
>was designed as a WIN95 32bit app although I had no problems
>with the earlier Metastock for Windows (3.1)app.
>
>Good luck,
>STAN
>
>
>
>At 02:25 AM 7/3/97 EDT, you wrote:
>>To all Windows 95 converts:
>>
>>I'm currently still using Windows 3.1 and will soon convert to Windows
>>95. Has anyone experienced problems or have advice that will make the
>>conversion as smooth as possible? In particular, I don't want to lose
>>any data in my Metastock directories. Will Metastock 4.5 (Realtime
>>version) continue to work as well under 95 as it does with 3.1? Thanks.
>>
>>Dick
>>
>>
>>
>
|