----- Original Message ----- 
  
  
  Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 2:00 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] 
  TC2000/TCNet/TC2005 and QP
  
  Hi Bob,
   
  It's been a while since we've exchanged many thoughts, I hope you are 
  well.  What keeps you going back to QP?
   
  Actually I've had both for years, along with multiple RT feeds as 
  well.  I'm sort of a belt and suspenders trader - most everything is 
  backed up or has an alternative (computers, data feeds, brokerages, broadband 
  and ISPs, even power with a generator system as I live in the country).  
  IMHO, they complement each other -- each with different strengths and 
  weaknesses.  I'll try to summarize both.
   
  The Pros: 
   
  QP has more fundamental fields exposed to AB in their API -- I 
  particularly like having float info (I still use a variant of the Rich E's old 
  PTATR for one exploration).  And at least until recently (I mark it more 
  or less with Janene's departure), the stock data had fewer errors and 
  when it did was corrected quicker.  Originally it ran much faster in AB 
  and as I first started with it, I had a predisposition for it's scanning 
  capability. If you use mutuals (I don't for timing or otherwise), they 
  are included with in a subscription.   
   
  TC has intraday updates (I run several boxes while trading) albeit 
  delayed, so I if I wish, I can then quickly run AB AAs on an entire 
  database, not the several hundred at a time from eSignal.  And they have 
  their media general groups (like the industry monitors in QP), but listed 
  within the sector so relative strength comparisons are much easier than 
  building and maintaining composites.  
   
  The Cons: 
   
  The QP data base (as I seem to recall you also complaining) is far from 
  clean -- I update my AB databases from the external ones each weekend and then 
  clean up inactive tickers -- QP generally has hundreds whereas TC has a 
  dozen or so.  I've spoken often to tech support at QP about this, and the 
  are always "surprised" by the number (I've sent them lists) and promise to 
  look into it, but nothing changes and a new disk (with a current database) 
  doesn't change the bad tickers.  [In fact I spoke to them today 
  again.]   And while I don't use mutuals funds, I understand that 
  they often fail to account for distributions and dividends promptly.  
  
   
  When there is a data problem with TC, they can take weeks to correct 
  it.  The program itself is something of a kludge of you are into writing 
  your own indicators, and of course you have to deal with the idiosyncrasies of 
  the Wordens (like, no ADX until just recently because they didn't think it had 
  merit, still no CCI, ATR, etc.).  True, with the most recent versions 
  your can write your own custom indicators, but ADX is not one of them and ATR 
  is impossibly long (over 30 steps for an ATR(10) ).  And while there is 
  some additional fundamental info in their database, it isn't 
  available via the API.  Mutual funds are an added 
  subscription cost.
   
  The upshot:
   
  I'm in my 5th year with AB and long ago came to regard both TC and QP as 
  merely end of day data feeds for AB.  If I could find another data vendor 
  that had the strengths of each, and perhaps not the weaknesses, I'd switch and 
  probably quit.  I run my end of day scans/exploration for watchlists on 
  these databases (also verify data integrity between the two), but for 
  trading I'm watching the RT data feeds - eSig, QuoteTracker fed by Prophet 
  Finance, PCQuote, and brokerage streamers.  I had IQ feed for a while but 
  found it was too dirty and erratic.  With the merger of Waterhouse and 
  Ameritrade, I'll probably close one account and open an IB account (when 
  Ameritrade got Datek, my account there got big enough and  I added 
  eTrade).  With whom are you trading, any thoughts or 
  recommendations?  
   
  Best  wishes, and good trades.
   
  Peace and Justice   ---   Patrick
  
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    
    
    Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:41 
    PM
    Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: New, fixed 
    TC2000/TCNet/TC2005 data plugin
    
    
    I 
    didn’t realize that you used TC2000x, 
    Patrick.
     
    Since 
    I’ve tried it a few times, but always went back to QPlus, could you spell 
    out why you picked it, given that you also have a RT 
    feed?
     
    Regards,
    Bob
 
Please 
  note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get 
  support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} 
  amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
---- LSpots keywords ?>---- HM ADS ?>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
---- LSpots keywords ?>
  ---- HM ADS ?>
  
  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS