Terry/Steve,
  I 
  was confused after Steve's e-mail (after I thought I knew what was going on!) 
  but now after comparing the results with "Allow Shrink" on and off I think I 
  may understand. Please set me straight if I don't.
   
  With 
  "Allow Shrink" on there were 741 trades in 5 years worth of data. With "Allow 
  Shrink" off there were 341 trades.
   
  It 
  appears that with "Allow Shrink" on and "Round Lot Size" set to 100, AB will 
  open multiple positions in increments of 100 shares up to the available 
  equity. These trades can be for much less than my "Initial 
  Equity".
   
  With 
  "Allow Shrink" off, AB will only open a position with the entire available 
  equity or it will not open one at all. This seems like an odd behavior. When 
  would you ever want to backtest a portfolio this way?
   
  I 
  appreciate all the replies I receive. It is all an education to me and 
  hopefully others can benefit too.
   
  Thanks again, Scott
  
    
    It will IF you check allow position size shrinking. That's what it's 
    for. AB assumes you want to trade all your money and your initial equity is 
    basically the minimum trade size unless you check this box. You can control, 
    via code, PositionSize to something other than -100 (trade all your money to 
    see compounded returns). If it's negative, it's a percent of portfolio, if 
    positive it's an absolute (fixed return) amount per trade. Combined with Max 
    open positions, this let's you trade a basket of stocks.
     
    I just mentioned the other parameters so you were aware. Sometimes 
    they keep you out of a trade you expected to get. 
     
    No matrix I'm aware of. Just the school of hard knocks 
    :-)
     
    Sorry if I'm telling you stuff you already know.
    --
    Terry
    
      
      
      Terry,
      Do you mean MORE than your original equity? If my first trade was a 
      loser, say I lose 25% of a $40k initial equity. Wouldn't AB just size the 
      next trade for the remaining $30k? I am still confused about 
      this.
       
      I have "Min. shares" set to 100 because I don't want to trade 
      anything less than that.
      I have "Round lot size" to 100 because I like round lot sizes of 
      100.
      I have "Limit trade size as % of entry bar volume" set to 
      1%.
      I do not have "Use previous bar equity for position size" 
      checked.
       
      Is there some kind of matrix somewhere which shows the relationship 
      of the different AA settings?
       
      Thanks for your time, Scott
      
        Position Size Shrinking 
        let's you take a trade with LESS than your
original equity. If it's 
        not checked and your first trade is a loser,
you don't get any more 
        trades. There are other things that affect your
trading too such as 
        minimum shares, round lot size, use previous bar for
equity and limit 
        trades size as % of equity. These are all in
AA->Settings. 
        
--
Terry
| -----Original Message-----
| From: 
        amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
| [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
        Behalf Of Scott Mariani
| Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 12:51 PM
| 
        To: AmibrokerYahooGroups
| Subject: [amibroker] Question on Position 
        Size Shrinking
| 
| 
| In the AA Backtester Settings there is a 
        option to "Allow 
| position size shrinking". This option makes a 
        huge difference 
| in my results. I need to understand what AB is 
        doing when it 
| is checked so I can replicate it in my real trading. 
        Below is 
| the help description:
| 
| "If you mark this box 
        AmiBroker will shrink down positions if 
| available equity is less 
        than requested position size (via 
| PositionSize variable). If this 
        box is unmarked positions 
| will not be entered in such case."
| 
        
| This help statement is not really clear to me. Does AB 
| 
        determine "requested position size" independent of available 
| 
        equity? I am not using any "PositionSize" variables in my 
| formula. 
        Is there another "setting" that controls "PositionSize"?
| 
| 
        Could someone explain how I relate this to trading my signals?
| 
        
| Thanks, Scott
| 
| 
| 
| ------------------------ 
        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
| --------------------~--> 
| Has 
        someone you know been affected by illness or disease? 
| Network for 
        Good is THE place to support health awareness 
| efforts! http://us.click.yahoo.com/Rcy2bD/UOnJAA/cosFAA/GHeqlB/TM
| 
        --------------------------------------------------------------
| 
        ------~-> 
| 
| Please note that this group is for discussion 
        between users only.
| 
| To get support from AmiBroker please send 
        an e-mail directly to 
| SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
| 
| For 
        other support material please check also: 
| http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
| 
        
|  
| Yahoo! Groups Links
| 
| 
| 
|  
| 
        
| 
Please note that this group is for 
        discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker 
        please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} 
        amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Please 
        note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get 
        support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT 
        {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check 
        also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Please 
    note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get 
    support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} 
    amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Please 
    note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get 
    support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} 
    amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html