[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I think you’re looking at the CME emini Russell, and yes, the volume is fine. I show the ICE version, which will replace the CME version, as only having 518 contracts traded last Friday.

 

Andrew

 

 

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of EAdamy
Sent: November 19, 2007 2:14 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; e-mini_traders_anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000

 

I'm showing 196K contracts traded today as of noon Mountain with 2 hours left to go. May pale in comparison to the ES but not shabby.

 

Earl

 


From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Nopper
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:37 AM
To: e-mini_traders_anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; RealTraders
Subject: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000

The CME will be delisting the ER2 contract at the expiry of the Sept '08
contract and ICE already has its version up and running. Volume, of course,
is pathetic with barely 1000 contracts traded in a day, but that should
change.

My only knowledge of ICE is from the frequent alerts from Interactive
Brokers that the ICE platform is down. I've seen no mention on these lists
of any concerns by traders of the move to ICE, whether the volume will be
the same as it is now, whether the CME will introduce a similar index and
what impact that will have, etc., etc.

Any thoughts anyone?

Andrew

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___