|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I shouldn't add to this thread but I just have to say that it should not
be legal for an elected Federal official to change parties after he/she
is elected. The candidate ran on a platform which had been endorsed
by his selected party offiliation and to which the voters elected
him/her. For a politician to just change to a new party, a new
platform and a new venue should not be allowed and in fact, the voters of
Vermont should have impeached this honorless man who gave us Tom Daschel,
(sp), simply because he was miffed that he wasn't invited to W's
daughter's b'day party.
It makes you not want to know what's next.
Bob
At 08:48 PM 11/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
A small
correction: The Senate and House where controlled by the
Republicans when W took office and the tax cut was passed. Jeffers
of Vermont switched to the Democrats just after, giving them control of
the Senate since.
Good luck and good trading,
Ray Raffurty
----- Original Message -----
From: Kent Rollins
To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....
Exactly what is so bad about W's economic team? I would like to hear some
specifics from Simms and Johnson. Specifics.
They got a massive tax cut though a Democratic Senate and they are working
to make them permanent and enact some more. They are working to privatize
Socialist Security. They are working to expand free trade.
Those are positives. What are the negatives?
Kent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Johnson" <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "M. Simms" <prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:29 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....
Hello M.,
I do agree with you that W's domestic team, esp the econ team, is weak
and ineffectual. I hope he cleans house for the good of the US and his
administration. But your assessment of there pressure on W is wishful
thinking. He is bullet proof for longer than 6 months. The Pitt
resignation would have had more political advantage for Bush had it
been done the <day before> the election. It would have shown W to be
concerned about corp corruption and all that blather the libs spout.
In my opinion W is perfectly situated for re-election. Market has
declined in first two years, rates get slashed. year 3 of election
cycle clicks in soon, maybe already. market rallies into Nov, 04.
Dem's will put Pelosi in as minority leader. she will embarrass the
Dem's every day. Gray Davis will be a persona non grata by Nov, 04
and W will attempt to retake California. Dem's are already switching
parties in the Georgia house. This looks to me like a replay of
Reagan's reign--tax cuts, economy pops, deficit that doesn't really
matter
W's vulnerability is that the economy is so broken it won't respond
normally or there's another terror incident that can be traced to
missteps of his administration.
that's my wishful thinking :)
Best regards,
Jim Johnson mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Attachment:
Description: ""
Attachment:
Description: ""
|