|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I had this book(let) "Astro-Economics" for a long time. IT was
published bin 1959 by Llewellyn Publilcations, Saint Paul, Minn.
The book in which the results of the Sorbonne statistician
Michele Gauquelin are discussed I could not find. But there
are a couple of others.
Dewey and Mandino, Cycles.
Playfair and Hill, The Cycles of Heaven.
Soyka and Edmonds, The Ion Effect.
Norman Winski wrote:
>
> MS,
>
> Who is wasting whose time? I don't remember you posting any proof or
> disproof or any accurate market forecasts? The proof of any science is its
> ability to predict.
>
> Looks like MB has a like minded buddy. Ain't that nice?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Norman
> in the sky with glasses
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MS" <mjs720@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:10 AM
> Subject: Re[3]: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element
>
> > Hello Mark,
> >
> > You are wasting your time with this conversation with Norman. He wants to
> > believe what he wants. If you wear colored glasses then the world will
> > look a certain way. Well, Norman has his glasses on...and no one...and
> > I mean NO ONE can tell him other than what he sees.
> >
> > If his interpatations works for him...then all the power. Spend your
> > time in coversations with others on this list who are so stuck on
> > themselves and their point of view.
> >
> > you wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Norman,
> >
> > NW>> NW: Wrong! There are computer programs available that can test for
> > NW>> correlations between planetary events and market movements and give
> you the
> > NW>> results in a few minutes.
> >
> > > correct you are - however i respectfully ask that you keep the open
> > > mind to understand that the results are static. anyone can test and
> > > optimize a static body of work and pick that results which proves the
> > > point that your eyes wish to see. a dynamic body (planetary) has a
> > > expansion factor that is not known as an absolute. thus any
> > > predictions based upon it are frivolous other than to prove the
> > > history has been fitted to the end means.
> >
> > NW>> The only thing you have proven is your lack of knowledge in
> this
> > NW>> area.
> >
> > > i know as much as i need to know.. at least about your chosen topic.
> > > what may i ask do you know about my preferred trading method? i have
> > > at least performed to my satisfaction - exhaustive research in a
> > > dismal, dreadful and less than enlightening planetary theory of old.
> >
> > NW>> Cheers,
> > NW>> Norman
> >
> > > ps i appreciate you not making personal comments towards my opinion.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Namaste',
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
M. Hubey
hubeyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|