[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Evictions Loom for Nasdaq Stocks



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Very interesting story from The Industry Standard.  The fat lady has 
only begun to sing.....

------------------------
http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,21477,00.html

January 15, 2001, 9:45 AM PST 

Evictions Loom for Nasdaq Stocks 

As their share prices fizzle, hundreds of new-economy companies 
suddenly find themselves at risk of being booted off the exchange. 

By Cory Johnson


BEHIND THE DATA 
In compiling this list, FactSet researchers applied the Nasdaq 
National Market's continued listing criteria. That standard 
(www.nasdaq.com/about/nnm1.stm) flags companies that fail to meet one 
of two sets of criteria. The first: net tangible assets of $4 
million; public float of 750,000; a $5 million market value of public 
float; a $1 bid price, 400 shareholders and two market makers. 
Failing that, a company must meet the second criteria; market 
capitalization greater than $50 million or total assets and revenue 
of $50 million each; public float over 1.1 million, market value of 
public float over $15 million, a $5 bid price, 400 shareholders and 
four market makers. 

If this logic seems tricky, you're right. For example, a stock price 
below $1, failing Standard One, can't possibly pass Standard Two, 
which requires a $5 stock price. "It might seem complicated,'' says 
FactSet's Michael Altmeier. "But once you plug in the Nasdaq's 
criteria, there's really not much to it." – C.J. 
 
Of all the documents Jana Wilson fed into the paper shredder earlier 
this month, one was destroyed with particular satisfaction. It was a 
one-page fax from the Nasdaq stock exchange, dated Nov. 9, informing 
the Garden.com (GDEN) chief financial officer that her company would 
be delisted – that is, removed from the Nasdaq.

"When you're told you're being kicked off, it kind of bums you out," 
said Wilson, as she packed her office things into boxes, preparing 
for Garden.com's liquidation. "I was glad to get rid of that letter – 
I really don't want it haunting me any further."

But for an alarming array of new-economy companies, the nightmare is 
just beginning. An investigation by The Standard has revealed that 
hundreds of companies no longer meet the Nasdaq's basic requirements 
for listing on the exchange, falling into jeopardy of being delisted. 
At imminent risk: the survival of more than 5 percent of the stocks 
on the Nasdaq national market.

Nasdaq officials decline to acknowledge which, or even how many, 
member companies have received such warnings. But The Standard asked 
FactSet Data Systems to compile a list of companies that no longer 
meet the Nasdaq's standards. The result is startling. According to 
FactSet, 257 companies have fallen below the Nasdaq's listing 
standards in the last six weeks alone.

But this may be just the tip of the iceberg. Another study by San 
Francisco investment bank Epoch Partners reveals that 38 more 
companies are just days away from such a fate.

The Nasdaq's listing standards can be arcane, and the secretive 
nature of the delisting process makes it even more confounding. 
Struggling companies are not automatically kicked off the exchange. 
But when Nasdaq-listed companies fail to meet two complicated sets of 
criteria, they can be delisted.

This was far from the minds of new-economy companies as they rushed 
to file IPOs; in recent years, the Nasdaq welcomed these young firms 
with open arms. But as the stock market has melted down over the last 
few months, many of these companies have seen their share prices 
tumble. And as they burned through IPO cash, they had little left by 
way of tangible assets. The upshot: As the market fell, the stocks 
dipped below the Nasdaq's minimums.

Of all the complicated requirements, the most damning is the $1 
rule. "If a company's share price is below $1 for 30 consecutive 
business days," says Nasdaq spokesman Wayne Lee, "we will properly 
notify the company that it is not in compliance."

That's the dreaded fax. Essentially, it's like getting kicked out of 
an apartment; first comes the eviction notice, then the actual 
eviction follows 90 trading days later, though that can be delayed by 
appeals and hearings.

To stave off getting the boot, a company must hoist its stock price 
back above $1 and keep it there for 10 days. And it has only 90 days 
to meet this hurdle. This struggle happens behind closed doors: The 
Nasdaq doesn't let the public know when these notices go out, and the 
firms aren't terribly forthcoming either. The Standard called 
hundreds of companies; several acknowledged receiving a warning 
letter from Nasdaq. But the response of Tickets.com (TIXX) was more 
typical: "Discussions we may or may not have had with Nasdaq are 
between the two entities," said investor relations representative 
Randall Oliver. "There is no obligation to disclose the content of 
any discussions that may have taken place."

Since these warnings can preclude an actual delisting, the Nasdaq 
insists the warnings are a private matter. "The Nasdaq is entrusted 
with the authority to maintain the quality and the public confidence 
in the market," says Lee. "Do you have any idea what would happen to 
public confidence if we were to print a list like this? Put yourself 
in the shoes of an investor in these stocks. This could do serious 
damage to these share prices."

THE BIG BOARD PICTURE
Although 5 percent is a substantial chunk of the Nasdaq, it's not 
unprecedented. Over the last decade, the Nasdaq has lost, on average, 
12.7 percent of its listings each year. (The Nasdaq's official tally 
is not limited to delistings; it also includes companies that merge 
or are bought out.) In recent years, however, the Nasdaq has been 
able to replenish itself with a new crop of IPOs. But given the 
overwhelming weakness in the current market, observers say it's 
unlikely that the IPO market will come back in any significant way.

"This was an overinvestment story," says John Skeen, director of 
portfolio strategy at Banc of America Securities. "There was too much 
money chasing the opportunity. There were too many IPOs. There were 
too many companies that shouldn't have been public, and now the 
market is taking care of that."

But one place where the rout isn't on is the venerable New York Stock 
Exchange. Critics have long charged the NYSE with being stodgy, and 
its listing standards as too lofty. But the current market 
environment has the NYSE looking like a calm port in the storm.

"The problem is that when these companies drop below the listing 
standard, sometimes they're just too far gone to pull up," says 
Thomas Rathjen, the New York Stock Exchange's western division VP and 
a former executive at the Nasdaq. "So yes, getting into the NYSE is a 
pretty significant hill to climb, but once you're up there, well, 
you're going to have fewer companies fail on the NYSE than you would 
on Nasdaq."

Rathjen, whose job is to sell the NYSE to large technology companies, 
says that the rampant Nasdaq delisting is making his job a lot 
easier. "I think we are perceived by many as a safe haven during 
times of trouble," he adds. "So I think there is a higher level of 
receptivity to our story these days."


NO WAY OUT
So how can companies fight delisting? The reverse stock split is the 
most dramatic, immediate method to fight delisting. PlanetRx.com 
(PLRX) tried it. On Dec. 1, the company said it would convert every 
eight shares into one share. The effect should have increased the 
share price eightfold. But by the time shareholders approved the 
deal, the stock was trading at 13 cents. When the reverse split took 
effect, the stock instantly dropped from $1 to 53 cents.

PlanetRx scheduled a hearing with the Nasdaq to appeal the delisting, 
but announced in mid-January that it wouldn't even show up for the 
hearing – the company had run out of defenses and opted not to press 
its case.

Companies that are kicked off the Nasdaq national market have a 
number of options, few of them good. According to analysts, the 
bylaws of most mutual funds and hedge funds do not permit ownership 
of stocks not listed on the major exchanges. So there are few buyers 
for delisted stocks.

Those companies can join the OTC Bulletin Board, a lesser exchange 
set up by the National Association of Securities Dealers, where penny 
stocks abound. Failing that, they can even fall to the Pink Sheets, a 
thinly traded exchange where share prices are quoted on printed, pink 
sheets distributed among certain Wall Street firms.

Many new-economy companies might try to make it on their own as 
privately held concerns. And over time, these damaged goods can 
reapply for a Nasdaq listing. But it's rare that such companies 
regain the trust of the Street. Another strategy to fight delisting 
is for a company to buy back its shares in the market, hoping to 
shore up the price. But that assumes companies have a pile of cash 
lying around. If that cash is spent buying back shares, it's not 
available to pay employees, develop new products, pay salespeople or 
keep the business running.

Of course, many of these businesses are barely running as it is. The 
fact that the stocks are even worth pennies is a wonder to many on 
Wall Street. "The music has stopped, but people are still dancing," 
says J. Carlo Cannell, of the San Francisco-based Cannell Capital 
hedge fund. Cannell is an expert in small stocks, and expects few of 
these stocks to survive. "The fact that these things have any market 
cap at all is what's crazy – they're in their grave, the earth has 
been thrown on top of them, and yet someone still thinks the stock is 
worth a few pennies. They won't for long."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Elinor Abreu, Meredith Alexander, Lessley Anderson, Blair Clarkson, 
Jen Davis, Miguel Helft and Lisa Shuchman contributed to this story. 


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx