[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Jan,
 
This should come to you twice.
 
I am using IE5.5 and clicked on the reply 
which comes up
with realtraders as an 
address.
 
To direct a reply to you I open your post 
and copy your
address from that post and past it into 
the  To:  box
of IE5.5
 
If there is an easier way I'd love to know 
also.
 
Clyde
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - -Clyde 
Lee   
Chairman/CEO          (Home of 
SwingMachine)SYTECH 
Corporation          email: <A 
href="mailto:clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx  7910 
Westglen, Suite 105       
Office:    (713) 783-9540Houston,  TX  
77063               
Fax:    (713) 783-1092Details 
at:                      
www.theswingmachine.com- - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - -
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  JHP 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 
  13:29
  Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for 
  Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
  Neil,Thanks a lot!BTW,  my question was 
  directed to JT , I hoped, in private for which I chose"Reply"rather 
  than "Reply All". As it happened before, however, it ended up 
  as"All".I asked RT once what is going on and how to reply 
  individually, but receivednoreply.Anybody knows?Jan 
  Philipp----- Original Message -----From: Neil Kerr 
  <nck1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:47 AMSubject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for 
  Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce> Hello Jan,>> 
  IMHO   In My Humble Opinion> Later> Neil> ----- 
  Original Message -----> From: "JHP" <jan4123@xxxxxxxxxx>> 
  To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 
  12:17 PM> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary 
  Bounce>>> > James,> >> > My 
  partner and I have tried to figure out what IMHO stands for and we> 
  > failed. Please explain it ASAP because our nerves are stretched 
  to> > the limit -:).> >> > Thanks,> > 
  Jan Philipp> >> > ----- Original Message -----> 
  > From: James Taylor <jptaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > To: 
  <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 
  7:51 AM> > Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary 
  Bounce> >> >> > > True, nobody knows.  
  But I think a heck of a lot of giddy,dart-throwing> > > fools 
  lost their shirts,> > > and retirement savings during this recent 
  dive.  The taxi-cab drivers> that> > > were offering 
  stock picking advice now have decided that they do not> like> 
  > to> > > trade stocks anymore.  The line of lemmings to 
  sign up for the next> run-up> > > will be much smaller, 
  IMHO.> > > and the fear is in the survivors minds what can happen 
  on thedownside,> > and> > > that seed of fear will 
  turn this upswing to dust before this year> ends --> > 
  I> > > am watching for the next entry short.> > 
  >> > > JT> > >> > > ----- Original 
  Message -----> > > From: "Carl Vanhaesendonck" 
  <carl.vanhaesendonck@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > To: 
  <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 
  2001 2:02 AM> > > Subject: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's 
  Temporary Bounce> > >> > >> > > > 
  James,> > > >> > > > I agree - I was not to 
  say that a new bull market was in order. Just> > > > that IMO 
  the bears would be taking a nap for a while. Nobody indeed> > > 
  > can say whether this will be only a upside reaction in a 
  bearmarket,> > > > or a new bull market.> > > 
  >> > > > Carl> > > >> > > 
  >> > > > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, "James Taylor" 
  <jptaylor@xxxx>wrote:> > > > > I wouldn't go so 
  far as to say a bull market is forming, far from> > > > 
  it.> > > > >> > > > > The lemmings that 
  got their lunch eaten by this last decline are> > > > 
  wiped-out,> > > > > and it will take a hell of a long time 
  for the next batch to amass> > > > enough> > > 
  > > money> > > > > to form another bull 
  market.> > > > >> > > > > We are at 
  best, in a bear market up leg.  I wouldn't get toexcited> > 
  > > about> > > > > it, unless you> > > 
  > > are a bear and are waiting to pounce on the next inflection 
  point.> > > > >> > > > > JT> > 
  > > >> > > > >> > > > > ----- 
  Original Message -----> > > > > From: "Carl Vanhaesendonck" 
  <carl.vanhaesendonck@xxxx>> > > > > To: 
  <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 
  January 16, 2001 2:48 AM> > > > > Subject: [RT] Re: The 
  Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce> > > > >> > 
  > > >> > > > > > Just one comment, I made the 
  following observation re Nasdaq and> > > > > > 
  Volume:> > > > > > The last months were characterized by 
  an inverted volumebehavior> > > > > > (increase in 
  volume when prices decreased, and decrease involume> > > > 
  > > when prices rised. From the 1st trading day this year, this 
  has> > > > > > changed: the volume increased increased 
  and decreased in synch> > > > with> > > > > 
  > price, which would suggest a bull market is emerging.> > > 
  > > >> > > > > > With most indicators, like 
  MACD, there has been not one, not 2,> > > > but a> > 
  > > > > triple bullish divergence, which is quite rare and also 
  could> > > > > > indicate the down-up trend reversal has 
  already started.> > > > > >> > > > > 
  > We will see...> > > > > >> > > > 
  > > Carl> > > > > >> > > > > 
  >> > > > > > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, DH 
  <catapult@xxxx> wrote:> > > > > > > > For me 
  the evidence is building that we have a significant> > > > 
  bottom> > > > > > at least> > > > > 
  > > > as good as fall 1999.> > > > > > 
  >> > > > > > > Further evidence, David Tice was a 
  holiday guest host on CNBC> > > > today> > > > 
  > > and> > > > > > > was answering questions 
  from little old ladies in investment> > > > clubs> > 
  > > > > about> > > > > > > how to short 
  stocks. :-)> > > > > > >> > > > > 
  > > --> > > > > > >   Dennis> 
  > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 
  > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> > 
  > > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 
  > >> > > > > >> > > > > 
  >> > > > > >> > > >> > > 
  >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:> > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > 
  > >> > > >> > > >> > > 
  >> > >> > >> > > To unsubscribe from 
  this group, send an email to:> > > 
  realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > 
  >> > >> > >> > >> 
  >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> 
  >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send 
  an email to:> 
  realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>>>To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx






eGroups Sponsor












To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx