[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Richard Dennis and Aberration



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

There are people out there that successfully day trade. They are very, very
rare. There are far more people successfully position trading.

But what a great business! Can you think of any other business that can
produce "experts" in such a short period of time? In many cases these
self-appointed experts have less experience than their customers.

Trading requires the same elements to be successful as any other business -
hard work, study, CAPITAL, planning, perseverance, time,etc. There is no
magic bullet, and there is no dispenser of magic bullets. If I do ever find
one, believe me , you'll never know about it!

Regards,

Tom Alexander


Alexander Trading & Management
----- Original Message -----

From: Jeff Kingery <taotrader@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 10:08 AM
Subject: [RT] RE: Re: Richard Dennis and Aberration


> Bill E. wrote:
>
> >...and if you take that very sensible logic
> >and advice to its ultimate conclusion
> >you end up day trading a single market!
>
> Well done, Bill!  I loved the way you took the wisdom of Mike's excellent
> post and twisted it into yet another sales pitch for your book!  However,
> although you refer to "logic," your statement is a "DNF," i.e. Does Not
> Follow (unless you've got books to sell!).
>
> The issues to which Mike referred will arise whether one trades a dozen
> markets from daily charts or a single market from tick charts.  One big
> difference is that in the latter case it happens much more rapidly.
Faster
> is not necessarily better.  It will be better for some, and worse for
> others... in some cases much worse.
>
> One can make a strong case that slower is better for those who are
"learning
> the ropes."  It can be very difficult to fully evaluate, psychologically
> process and learn from each and every trade when you're making two or
three
> trades a day, day after day.  Also, a shorter time-frame generally yields
> smaller average trades, which give less margin for error.  This can be
very
> costly for a new trader, because the less practice you've had at trading,
> the more mistakes you're going to make.  If you're new to trading it's
quite
> possible that you will make mistakes on every single trade.  Having time
to
> learn from your mistakes before repeating them could save a lot of $$$,
and
> perhaps a lot of grief.
>
> I'm sure we'll now hear from Bill that nothing could be further from the
> truth, and that day-trading the T-bonds is the best of all possible
worlds,
> because he wants to sell his book.  Not having seen his book I don't have
> any opinion on its value.  However, these endless sales pitches about the
> "best" way to trade miss the point completely.  There simply isn't any
> "best" way to trade.  The question is not "What's the best way to trade?"
> but rather "What's the best way for <me> to trade?"  It's quite a
different
> question.
>
> My guess is that for <most> new traders, the best answer is <not> going to
> be "Day-trading the T-bonds using a purely discretionary method."
>
> Your mileage may vary.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff Kingery
>
>
>
> Mike wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Remember, it is never enough to test a trading system,
> > see a 30% drawdown and say "well, that's not too bad -
> > I can handle that."  Make sure you can handle that
> > if you're in the drawdown for 6 months to a year,
> > and you're required to continue to put trades in,
> > day after day, with the result of most trades
> > being losers.  That will happen with EVERY TRADING SYSTEM
> > at some point (although the drawdown duration will differ)
> > - do you have the stomach to endure?
> >
> > Make absolutely sure you can say "yes" before you
> > put a cent into any trading system and start trading.
> > Just my two cents.
> >
> > Michael Strupp
> > Chicago IL
>
>