|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I am not a Gann expert, but it is my understanding that Gann developed his
geometry methods early in his career, and didn't use astrology until his
later years......so I question the "First and foremost".
Adam Hefner
----- Original Message -----
From: "nwinski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 6:03 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: Gen: Keep it quiet. {02}
>
>
> Brent wrote:
>
> > I have been reading one of Gann's books I'm astounded by just the few
things
> > that I've read in the first 50 pages. I have been writing indicators to
test
> > these things and I can't hardly believe my eyes. No one must actually
read
> > this stuff. I never hear anyone talk about it. I'm seriously thinking of
> > throwing all my old analysis away. I didn't think much about Gann until
I
> > figured out how to put Gann angles on charts. After that I could see
that
> > there might be something to it. I'm just dumbfounded.
> >
> > Brent,
>
> Just wait until you add Astrology to your analysis. First and
foremost,
> Gann was an Astrology.
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Norman
>
>
>
|