|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
In a message dated 12/15/98 8:10:37 AM Eastern Standard Time, MAILER-
DAEMON@xxxxxxx writes:
<< << Hi, just read your e-mail about trading systems. Can you explain a
little
more about the two systems you wrote about?
Thanks
Mark >>
good morning all
as you all know diversification is the key for low dd
abbratin is not a great system but pays for itself many times over
it trades only 2-4 times fer year per commodity
you must trade MANY commodities to realy make good money
it uses a continues contract and a long term outlook ,
most positions are on 2-4 weeks and even longer
the biggest problem with it is that it gives back to the market the proffit
it already made.
example
let say it says to buy soybeam
you buy
2-5 days later you are loosing 2-4K , 10 days later you are making
2-4K ,
and then back to even ,. 4 weeks later you make2-4K ,,
this up and down equity will drive anybody crazy
i solve it but optimizing the proffitts in the stops sectin of s.c 4.0
each comodity has its own
it is simple to do since it is a continues contract
so each time one of the 20 commodities i follow is ahead by the proffit
stop
i exit
with that proffit and re enter in the same direction of the signal at the
open of the next day
dual trut i only have a 4 month experince on the sp
and 6 weeks on nasdaq bonds dow.
biggest problem is dd
i have an old vertion(i understand that there is an update)
to solve the dd i have optimised in the stop section the proffit objective
to have the lowest dd
it did VERY well on the dec sp contract
if it will continue in the march contract??
we all know that past performence is NOT an indication for the future
this is only 30% of capital split 15% into abbration and 15%in dual trust
hope this help
Ben
>>
Return-Path: <>
Received: from rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (rly-zd04.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.228]) by
air-zd03.mail.aol.com (v53.27) with SMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:10:37
-0500
Received: from imo24.mx.aol.com (imo24.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.68])
by rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id IAA25347 for <Proffittak@xxxxxxx>;
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:10:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by imo24.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
with internal id IAA04164;
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:10:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:10:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Message-Id: <199812151310.IAA04164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
The original message was received at Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:09:07 -0500 (EST)
from root@xxxxxxxxx
*** ATTENTION ***
An e-mail you sent to an Internet destination could not be delivered.
The Internet address is listed in the section labeled:
"----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
The reason your e-mail could not be delivered is listed in the section
labeled:
"----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.
Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<realtradrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to list.listserver.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<realtradrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<<< 550 <realtradrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
550 <realtradrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
----- Original message follows -----
Received: from Proffittak@xxxxxxx
by imo24.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id OGZTa11669;
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:09:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
Return-path: <Proffittak@xxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <5f009c32.36765f72@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:09:06 EST
To: markcrisp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: realtradrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: What is the Dual Thrust?/abbration
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 230
In a message dated 12/15/98 5:13:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,
markcrisp@xxxxxxxxx writes:
<< Hi, just read your e-mail about trading systems. Can you explain a little
more about the two systems you wrote about?
Thanks
Mark >>
good morning all
as you all know diversification is the key for low dd
abbratin is not a great system but pays for itself many times over
it trades only 2-4 times fer year per commodity
you must trade MANY commodities to realy make good money
it uses a continues contract and a long term outlook ,
most positions are on 2-4 weeks and even longer
the biggest problem with it is that it gives back to the market the proffit
it already made.
example
let say it says to buy soybeam
you buy
2-5 days later you are loosing 2-4K , 10 days later you are making
2-4K ,
and then back to even ,. 4 weeks later you make2-4K ,,
this up and down equity will drive anybody crazy
i solve it but optimizing the proffitts in the stops sectin of s.c 4.0
each comodity has its own
it is simple to do since it is a continues contract
so each time one of the 20 commodities i follow is ahead by the proffit stop
i exit
with that proffit and re enter in the same direction of the signal at the
open of the next day
dual trut i only have a 4 month experince on the sp
and 6 weeks on nasdaq bonds dow.
biggest problem is dd
i have an old vertion(i understand that there is an update)
to solve the dd i have optimised in the stop section the proffit objective
to have the lowest dd
it did VERY well on the dec sp contract
if it will continue in the march contract??
we all know that past performence is NOT an indication for the future
this is only 30% of capital split 15% into abbration and 15%in dual trust
hope this help
Ben
|