|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Brent</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
yes...advanved get (a long time ago)... Its great & makes money as it gives
good signals especially with MOB etc but its not elliott. Its a great system .
Proper elliott analysis does not go back to change counts as true elliott will
solidify structural counts without returning back to ammend a
structure to fit the markets movements later on. ie A proper count has no other
alternative .[in respect to structural labeling] as there is only one true
count. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> My point was that a true
purist approach to elliott is so complex that only a skilled person
can do it. For example a correction may truely be an "abc-x-abc" but a
software program will classify it as simply "abc". Now yes the
structure is a correction but its not abc, .advanced get does this in that
it dosnt utilise x waves as its to complex. This is the point. Further if
its really an abc-x-abc rather than an abc as the software would put it to
you then there are different market implications to post corrective activity,
which you would not be aware of if you thought it was a simply abc . Therefore
your missing a heap of information that elliott gives you , but which you miss
out on if you use software.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> I hope you understand my
point</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>Peter</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>Peter</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>BrentinUtahsDixie <<A
href="mailto:brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B><A
href="mailto:derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
<<A
href="mailto:derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Wednesday, 4 November 1998 7:07<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: S&p
analysis<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Have you tested many EW software programs?
If so which ones? No offense intended but we need more info to evaluate your
oponion.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Brent</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original
Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Peter [KKD] <<A
href="mailto:derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Tuesday, November 03, 1998 12:31 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: S&p
analysis<BR><BR></DIV></FONT> For those who are
interested in elliott analysis, take my
sincere<BR>advice...elliott wave software programs is not elliott
wave theory . What<BR>it is , is generally a software program
thats a "system". It may make money<BR>yes, but it is
generally not elliott. No software program, at least in my<BR>life
time will ever in my opinion conduct true elliott analysis...it
may<BR>conduct pattern analysis but that is not structural analysis .
Structural<BR>analysis is wave elliott wave theory is all
about.<BR> FWIW Miners count is wrong..but hey I'm not
a computer<BR>Peter Karaguleski<BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: <A
href="mailto:Peter2150@xxxxxxx";>Peter2150@xxxxxxx</A> <<A
href="mailto:Peter2150@xxxxxxx";>Peter2150@xxxxxxx</A>><BR>To:
RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Date:
Wednesday, 4 November 1998 6:18<BR>Subject: Re: S&p
analysis<BR><BR><BR>>In a message dated 98-11-03 12:10:02 EST, <A
href="mailto:tesla@xxxxxxx";>tesla@xxxxxxx</A>
writes:<BR>><BR>>> For all the S&P traders out there Bob
Minor does a great job of analyzing<BR>>> where the market is most
likely headed in the next few weeks.
The<BR>analysis<BR>>is<BR>>> at his web site <A
href="http://www.dynamictraders.com";>www.dynamictraders.com</A> under
current trade<BR>recommendation.<BR>>> Good
day.<BR>>><BR>><BR>>So... Have you tracked
it to see if it is
right.<BR>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Nov 03 12:43:20 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 11441
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 15:39:46 -0400 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id MAA18294;
Tue, 3 Nov 1998 12:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo19.mx.aol.com (imo19.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.9])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id MAA18045
for <REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 12:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Accandel@xxxxxxx
by imo19.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id AZKPa04680
for <REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 15:31:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <171621c1.363f681c@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 15:31:24 EST
Reply-To: Accandel@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Accandel@xxxxxxx
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: GEN: SYSTEM
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-To: REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 224
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 0c4e509e63b091191fda5ed571d9c955
Has anyone heard anything about Chuck Hughes trading system. I'll will
appreciate any information.
Thanks for your time
|