[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RES: stock to buy- GPRE



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

From what I have found over the years it is public one would have most
trouble with when trying to get something done.
Some of the public agrees with something.
Some of the public dissagrees with it.
You have peta, the greenies, hollywood, the country, the city and in-between.

If the Gov. would do whats right and good for all and not worry about how and who elected them things could get done a little easier. That is why a private company or you and a group of friends can do more in your backyard or garage than anything to do with the public can do or want to do.

Kind of like on this forum. I would say look at everything and put money and labor tpwards it all. But many seems to say solar. When that would actually be last on my list of stuff. So there you go.

We have to look at all and push for all, but pick what we can do now and in the near future and do it.
Who is going to do the picking?  The Gov.?


----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Gurke" <rgurke@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: RES: stock to buy- GPRE


Speaking of "think-tanks" ...can you imagine something along the lines of a Manhattan Project focusing on alternative and/or renewable energy technologies. Does anyone believe that we couldn't solve this problem fairly quickly, if we actually had the political will and devoted the necessary resources to it...


----- Original Message ----- From: <marcmiller.themap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: Fw: RES: stock to buy- GPRE


I agree 100% with Gary.
Right Friggin on- This is EXACTLY what we need to do.
This is a very impressive "think-tank" here at the omegalist.
US Gov- are you listening?!!
I was in Mexico on vacation, in the city I was staying used
SOLAR water heaters on all the rooftops- of course it wasn't the climate
of Green Bay, Wisconsin-- but let's see some TAX breaks
passed to make this feasable in the areas that can support them.
A buddy of mine in California said that he can sell electricity back to the grid at 90 cents on the dollar, but here where I live, a buddy checked into
solar
and found that he could only selll it for 8-10 cents on the dollar (back to
the grid.)
Need some changes made.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Fritz" <fritz@xxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: RES: stock to buy- GPRE


On 4 Jul 2008 at 21:41, Randy wrote:
> No matter how much we want or hope for a solar , wind  alternative
> energy solution .....it's not going to happen . Lump them all > together
> and the most optimistic forecasts  are 5-10 percent of current
> consumption.

It doesn't have to be.  I did a back-of-envelope calculation once to see
how
much solar energy could be produced on the government-owned lands of the
desert Southwest. It would take an area of roughly 40,000 square miles to
produce energy equal to the ENTIRE energy budget of the US, assuming
only 10% efficiency. The US Govt owns 200,000 square miles of prime solar real estate in Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico. If they would cede 50k or
100k of that land to a US Energy Trust, they could launch a "man-on-the-
moon" class of initiative that could make the US entirely energy self-
sufficient, and virtually eliminate our dependence on polluting energy
sources like coal or nuclear.

Yes, there would be environmental impacts in the area -- but consider the
environmental and economic impacts of coal mining, burning coal or oil,
disposing of nuclear wastes -- or engaging in wars in the Mideast.

Should we try to replace 100% of the US energy consumption with solar?
Probably not, as there are other problems involved. But it could provide
a
HUGE percentage of the energy this country needs, with a self-built and
self-
owned source of endless clean energy.

Gary