[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: JMA (was: Hull Moving average)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

--- Alex Matulich <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> My own tests, for example, of statistical
> probability bands above
> and below an expected price value do indicate that a
> smoother with
> low lag and no overshoot represents "expected" price
> better than
> anything else, and the indicator bands that result
> would not be
> used as an entry/exit signal, but as a "reversion to
> the mean" bias
> indicator.
> 
> There aren't useless tools, only useless appliers of
> those tools.
> Many indicators, smoothers, and other functions we
> have ARE useless
> for the traditional purposes published about them. 
> But then someone
> comes along and finds an innovative way to apply
> something in a
> useful way, when it seemed useless before.  Woodie's
> forum and CCI
> is one example.
>

I do not know where you learned statistics, but I bet
your low-lag smoother represents the expected price
value far worse than statistically un-biased estimate:

price tomorrow equals price today

can't beat that.