|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
As in worthless? Yes..LOL Your'e right...as are all the endless emails
that follow, that go off topic!
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Dawson [mailto:si@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2007 11:57 AM
To: IVT
Cc: Gary Fritz; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hull Moving average
Having watched & talked to Gary & Alex over the last, God, how many
years? Can I say on behalf of the list..
mwuahahaha...
*wipes eyes*
thanks, that was priceless.
IVT wrote:
> it never had any edge at all, a stupid thing to do.
>
> you two guys are talking to yourself.
>
> --- Gary Fritz <fritz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> However, I don't think T3 ever gave the original JMA a run for its
>>> money. I saw the performance of the original JMA. T3 had more lag
>>> and overshoot. T3 also can't adapt to sudden changes (like when
>>> there's a limit move) without requiring significant settling time.
>> JMA always did better than T3, but T3 was free. I suspect there are
>> not that many people who could actually make profitable use of the
>> differences between T3 and JMA. Mark told me (years ago) that he
>> thought T3 was a formidable competitor and that he wanted to improve
>> JMA to give it more of an edge.
>>
>> Yes, JMA responds much better to sudden moves than T3 does. Gary
>
>
--
2:52 PM
--
2:52 PM
|