|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello Jim,
inputs:adxlen(28),adxavg(2),dmilen(28),dmiavg(2),adxzone(15); {sp,$tick,$ticki,$adv,$dec}
Inputs: N(25),UDVzone(1);
inputs:LENGTH(20),FRSTDATA(C OF DATA4),SECNDATA(C OF DATA5);
vars:v1(0),v2(0),v3(0),v4(0),v5(0),v6(0),v7(0),v8(0),v9(0),v10(0),v11(0),v12(0);
v1=ADX(adxlen);
v2=ADXZone;
v3=average(value1[1],adxavg);
v4=Average(dmiplus(dmilen),dmiavg);
v5=Average(dmiminus(dmilen),dmiavg);
v6=UDVolume(N);
v7=UDVzone;
v8=Diff(FRSTDATA,SECNDATA);
v9=AVERAGE(Diff(FRSTDATA,SECNDATA),LENGTH);
condition10=v8<v9; {A/D Line lessr than average A/D line showing calm market}
condition1=v1<=v2; {ADX below ADXzone showing market is still}
condition2= v3>v1; {ADXavg greater than ADX so its rising showing market strength increassing}
condition3=v4>v5; {DMIplus greater than DMI minus showing market direction up}
condition4=v4<v5; {DMIplus less than DMI minus showing market direction down}
condition5=v6<v7; {UDV Less Than UDVzone showing market stillness}
condition6=h of data2<280 and h of data2>50; {High of $Tick less than 280 showing average trading}
condition7=l of data2>-280 and l of data2<-50 ; {Low of $Tick less than -280 showing average trading}
condition8=h of data3<21; {High of $Ticki less than 21 showing average trading}
condition9=l of data3<-21; {Low of $Ticki less than -21 showing average trading}
{-------------------------------- all items above are to identify calm market ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------}
if condition1 then plot1(o,"1");
if condition5 then plot2(h,"2");
if condition6 then plot3(c of data2,"3");
if condition7 then plot4(c of data2,"4");
Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 11:53:23 AM, you wrote:
> A few years ago I read of a Condition indicator that I think either Bob
> Fulks or Mark Brown had developed. It is not complicated but involves using
> features that I don't normally use. It displays the status of Conditions on
> the data1 chart. It answers the question as to which condition is not met
> and eliminates the need to run a separate calculation of them. Anyone know
> of this?
> thanks,
> Jim
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:qpwoeirutyalskdjfhgmznxbcv_markbrown_omegalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|