|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Which functions are bad in jacking up system code toward the 64K limit? I
know that ADX is near the limit, but how about some others? Isn't the
IncludeSystem thing a kludge? And wouldn't writing dll's instead make more
sense if the system code is particularly complex and over the 64K limit? At
least the dll's could be called from any TS version (yes, I understand the
16 vs 32 bit compiler issues). And wouldn't writing them in a more user
friendly language (than EL) go smoother and faster once the language had
been learned? At least there's more resources (and programmers) available
for C++ or Powerbasic than 2 EL books and a manual! :-)
MT
>No. All function code is included in the 64k ceiling. However, if
>you use an IncludeSystem, the code in that included system IS NOT
>counted toward your 64k limit.
>
>That depends entirely on the complexity of code, the amount of
>comments & whitespace in your code, etc. I just looked at a
>particularly large system -- it contains over 240 lines (about 4
>pages) of code and comments, and it hasn't hit the limit yet. I just
>tried adding more code, and was able to add almost 200 more lines of
>code (no comments) before I got a "Not enough memory" error from the
>Power Editor when I verified it. I still didn't get the 64k message
>from TS.
|