|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I NEVER SAID THAT. Dennis was a great trader - no question about that....so
was Soros and Buffett.
Shooting from the hip ? Hardly, all I'm doing is reporting FACTUAL
information.
Get the copy yourself and read it yourself.
If you don't like my conclusions, that's fine. But I'm entitled to my
opinions.
If you've got a problem with that, you've got a problem.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Morge [mailto:tmorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 9:15 AM
> To: prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Omega-List
> Subject: Re: Barron's Report on CTA performance: another oldie gets
> "hit"
>
>
> M:
>
> If I remember correctly, you say Soros is a loser; Dennis is a
> loser; Buffet is
> a loser...
>
> Richard Dennis is a loser because you think he is? Have you taken
> the time to
> look at his year over year performance for his entire public
> trading career? Or
> Soros? Or Buffet?
>
> From what I can tell in your posts, you have no real knowledge of
> any of these
> traders--you're just shooting from the hip. You read an article
> and now you are
> a qualified critic of public fund managers? How long have you
> been managing
> public money? Do you have a chunk of your own money invested with a fund
> manager?
>
> The sage advice you offer is fine, on its own. But do you really
> feel qualified
> to say that these fund managers are 'history?'
>
> It's really easy to take shots at public figures from the 'cheap seats...'
>
> Tim Morge
>
> "M. Simms" wrote:
>
> > Remember a guy named Richard Dennis ?
> > Back in the 70's and 80's, he was a top commodities trader....
> > I believe he took a $50,000 account to something like 8 million
> in a matter
> > of a few years.
> >
> > His trading company "Dennis Trading" can be found on the bottom of the
> > performance list in the recent edition of Barrons.....(-74%) YTD
> > performance....right near the bottom.
> >
> > Whatever he did back then, apparently is not working in today's markets.
> >
> > Times change, markets change. If you don't change with 'em,
> you're history.
>
|