[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cycles and averages



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

>>I thought you (or perhaps some other List members) might be able to 
suggest something I could read to
improve my understanding of this thread's subject.<<

There really ought to be a book called "Hitchhikers Guide to Signal 
Processing", but I haven't found it.

- mark



----------
From: 	Monte C. Smith[SMTP:mcs@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 	Thursday, July 27, 2000 3:41 PM
To: 	Mark Jurik
Cc: 	'Omega List'
Subject: 	Re: Cycles and averages

Hello Mark,

Thanks for that (to me) enlightening reply:

Mark Jurik wrote:
>
> Monte:
>
> >>... In summary, I think a 2-line ma crossover system whose best return 
on account comes from inverted ma lengths, does so because the ma crossover 
system lag is the duration of the cycle.<<
>
> You are very close... actually the crossover lags by 1/2 the cycle 
length,

Of course, that's what I should have written...1/2 cycle length... I was
focused on a buy-side perspective.


> so inverting the MACD logic puts it right back in phase with the > 
oscillating signal.

aha! I understand...my electronics training is all coming back to me now
(thank you control data)

> However, this approach is risky because during an uptrend, the reverse > 
logic will suggest going short. Consequently, this approach works best > on 
markets that spend most of the time reversing within a channel.

excellent observation, thank you. When you say 'reversing within a
channel' I suppose you mean a channel whose movement is sideways.

My facility with mathematics is somewhat limited, and I'd be lucky to
program my way out of a paper bag (looking at some courses in Visual
Basic programming now)... for these reasons the GAP between ideas and
implementation for testing is usually more like a GULF or CHASM for
me..but these hurdles notwithstanding, I thought you (or perhaps some
other List members) might be able to suggest something I could read to
improve my understanding of this thread's subject.

Thanks again.

Regards,
Monte