[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unidentified subject!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

What has this got to do with trading?
Political discussions belong on a different list.

----- Original Message -----
From: <simon32@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:16 PM
Subject: Unidentified subject!


> "yeah, yeah, i know, ronnie ray-gun signed off on those massive deficits
> that were CREATED by a DEMOCRATIC HOUSE, ya know :)))"
>
> tj,
>
> everyone knows it was the respublican president and senate that got us
into
> that mess mess in the first place.  they tax and spend even more than
democrats.
>  the truth is they just disguise their actions better.  you tihnk you'll
> get a tax cut with bush, guess again.  it'll be smoke and mirrors.  even
> extremist coalitions like club for growth are angry at republicans for
their
> legendary pork barrel spending.
>
>
> TJ Wrote
> oh NO, it couldn't have been the DEMOCRATIC HOUSE who was in power during
> the 80's, could it???
>
> everyone KNOWS (sez the press) how POOR the DEMOCRATS in congress are!!!
>  well, i'm certainly secure in my knowledge that ted kennedy's family
fortune
> is safe for another 15 or so years earning 17% :)))
>
> TJ
>
> sorry ron, couldn't resist a little political sarcasm and truth, it's been
> a while
>
> yeah, yeah, i know, ronnie ray-gun signed off on those massive deficits
> that were CREATED by a DEMOCRATIC HOUSE, ya know :)))
>
> TJ
>
> next week.....gun control revisited :))
>
>
> At Wed, 31 May 2000 11:12:51 -1000, Ron Augustine <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >If you look back at the '80s, yields were dropping in a normal cyclical
> >manner and the party in power wanted to give their people a place to
> >park
> >their money at high yields for the next 30 years.  Massive deficits
> >were
> >created that had to be covered--
>
>
>