|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ivan wrote:
>.....From what I understand, you need about 200 Mhz more from your
>processor to get the same performance out of Windows 2000 as opposed to NT...
Take a look at:
http://creative.zdnet.com/micro/windows2000/reviewsZD_SmartMove.htm
How do you figure W2k needs an additional 200MHz over NT to
get the same performance? Seems to contradict the tests as
reported by PC Week.
Best regards,
Jim
|