|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dans un courrier daté du 01/03/99 17:14:16 Heure d5iver Pari16 Madrid,
a.myers@xxxxxxxx a écrit :
> Orphelin@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >I cannot say for editing.
> >TS2000 is not worse that TS4 for collecting data and maintenance.
>
> This makes no sense to me. You did say that data can be optionally saved
> under various timeframes. You didn't answer the real question which was
"is
> it true that you have to correct a bad tick in each time frame
seperately?".
>
> If the answer to this is "yes, you do have to correct bad ticks seperately
> in each time frame" then your statement about TS2000 not being worse than
> TS4 is incorrect.
>
> You can't say "I don't know the answer to your question, but it is better".
> It is either one or the other. Which is it?
>
I only know the server by observing comments and documentation.
My point is that collecting data is better than before.
Concerning bad tick editing, I do not know yet.
Maybe someone could answer ( as a real realtime user).
I cannot speak of what I do not know.
Sorry...
PO
|