|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
ROFL, Why Mr DeMark where is all the gentlemanly verbiage of pass. Do what
ever Tom just please stop whining I like you much better this way.
Robert
Tom DeMark wrote:
>cummings,
>
>i should have learned my lesson. since you believe you can operate
>inside my mind which you cannot, i will simply set the record straight
>once and for all.
>
>i'll leave the forum, as others have before me, due to your ridicule and
>stupidity.what's the purpose in sharing with someone as stubborn and
>egotisitcal as you are since you obviously know more than what i do and
>you can detect peoples' motives--there's only one other person who
>possesses your skill and you'll hopefully meet Him someday and account
>for your behavior.you don't know me and will never if i can help it.
>
>i cited larry because he went through the same exasperating experiences
>i did with you and mark and dan. his conclusion was the same as mine,
>why share anything with ingrates and know it all people like you,
>cummings-you only know best and everything.(boy, you can certainly
>incite the worst in someone).
>
>you can't even do your own work profitably--as you pointedly said
>yesterday, you're a loser in the tech anlysis game and only made money
>when you "guessed" the direction of the internet stocks--maybe that the
>bile rejecting the venom in your body. yes, larry and i have been best
>friends for more years than you can count. he possesses many qualities
>and atributes you're certainly missing and only hope for.what's made our
>relationship durable? we believe in sharing and conducting our business
>and social lives in a civil and courteous manner. the only people you
>appear to tolerate are chesler and brown and then only because you're of
>the same ilk. their turn will come for you to attack and vice
>versa--that's just your make-up.
>
>back door front door whichever slam to mark or dan--both of them are
>misrepresenting themselves as well. dan professes to be the biggest
>trader and operator in the oj pit--well the pit's never heard of him.
>mark claims to have worked for tudor and no one there has ever heard of
>him either. do you want to believe them? what have they contributed to
>the profession.why don't they tell the truth and why aren't your guns
>directed toward them. i have never done anything which would cause you
>to disbelieve me.
>
>another name drop about a recently deceased trader. no, it's just that
>people in the group may have met don and wanted to deliver their
>condolences to the family. i wonder if you would show the same
>disrespect if someone from your family has passed away-i wouldn't be
>surprised. you have no compassion or trust in anyone. i observed the way
>you manhandled someone a couple of weeks ago who was grieving the loss a
>loved one.
>
>***as far as promoting and receiving piles of money for seminars--just
>to set the record straight for you, dan, and mark, i have NEVER received
>a penny for ANY seminar i have attended. i have NEVER been involved in
>the promotion or paid for any. yes, i wrote two books but you can count
>on one hand the royalties from books. where are these promotions you and
>your cohorts are so jealous of and where is the wealth i derive?
>
>once again don't speculate. get facts.
>
>tom demark
>
>
|