[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: DMX...zero division...failure value



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Nope, this system is actually a traditional system taken out from Larry William + Adealide based share trading institution. 



Regards


Adam




----- Original Message ----
From: almut1971 <no_reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 22 December, 2006 3:34:27 AM
Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: DMX...zero division...failure value

Hi Adam,

Had you by any chance done a hometrader course because your long entry 
is along their lines.

Cheers

Norman

--- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, Adam Parker <adamp_27@xx .> 
wrote:
>
> Ok Preston thanks you for your explanation
> 
> 
> Here this is the system for every one
> 
> 
> 1. 200 moving average must be at least 4.5 *(10)ATR greater than it 
was 50 days ago
> 2. ATR(30)/Mov( C,30,S)>300000
> 3. the trun over of 21 days must > than 30000
> 4.standard error gate (C,100) <0.32
> 5. close is the lowest low value in 8 days
> 6. this system perform best for blue chips
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> Now I become clear
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: pumrysh <no_reply@xxxxxxxxxx s.com>
> To: equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 December, 2006 7:04:59 AM
> Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: DMX...zero division...failure 
value
> 
> Adam,
> 
> You can smooth at any point in an indicator BUT you should always 
> ask at what cost and to what benefit. Let me explain. Smoothing is a 
> way of taking the average over a period of time. It introduces lag 
> or will slow down the responsiveness of the indicator. Try it for 
> yourself...plot a close and a 5 day moving average on a daily chart. 
> What happens? The close which has no lag on a daily chart and will 
> always lead the moving average in direction and value. 
> 
> Your first consideration then should be whether or not you will 
> benefit from the lag. In this instance as you have seen there is no 
> benefit to using a weighted average. The reason is in the 
> calculation of weighted versus exponential. An exponential average 
> uses a percentage of recent calculations along with a percentage of 
> previous calculations. Thus it is less likely to go to a zero value. 
> Obviously a weighted average could have a zero value. 
> 
> The problem that you have encountered is a division by zero error 
> and is one that has plagued coders for some time especially when 
> dealing with a RSI type of calculation which the DMI is. There are a 
> number of ways to solve the problem. In the various codes that I 
> presented there were several solutions. You have just found one. 
> Another is using Max(vt,.0000001) . In this code you are simply 
> telling metastock to use the higher value of vt or .00000001. 
> Therefore you would never have a zero value. Prev, prev is another 
> way to solve the problem. My preference is not to use the prev 
> statement simply because prev statements tend to slow down the 
> calculation process.
> 
> As far as smoothing you might want to smooth the final output value. 
> Here you should be able to use any method without encountering any 
> division error problems.
> 
> I did notice your request for DMI systems. Here are some helpful 
> hints. The DMI trades just like the RSI so any system that uses it 
> will be adaptable to the DMI. 
> 
> Normally, the RSI is useless when the up or positive values equal 
> the minus or down values. Since the RSI is scaled from 0 to 100 this 
> occurs around the value of 50(failure value). There is also a 
> limitation of the RSI when the 0 to 100 scale is used. In other 
> words it is bound by its range. To overcome this obstacle I 
> introduced a bipolar version of the indicator. The bipolar version 
> takes away the scaling limitations allowing the values to exceed 100 
> and moves the failure value to 0. Therefore it becomes far easier to 
> associate the swings beyond the plus or minus 50 with some other 
> turning event such as an increase in trading volume. Some beneficial 
> reading might be the books of Wilder or Chande & Kroll.
> 
> Hope you find this helpful,
> 
> Preston 
> 
> --- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, "adamp_27" <adamp_27@ .> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Preston
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I really appreciate on your effort. I got some questions in 
> regards 
> > to DMX that you have code
> > 
> > 
> > 1. could it be possible that the smoothing moving average 
> > exponential argument be changed into weighted moving average
> > 
> > 2. if the above mentioned can be changed why at this section 
> > PDX:=ExtFml( "ForumDll. VarMOV",Up, pds,E);
> > MDX:=ExtFml( "ForumDll. VarMOV",Dw, pds,E); can not be changed. if 
I 
> > change this into W the error message appear on the text. this 
> > formula is the second formula from 2 types of the given formula
> > 
> > 
> > Again, thanks for your advance knowledge in coding
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > 
> > Adam
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, pumrysh <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > Kevin,
> > > 
> > > Thanks! Always tickled to see someone else enjoying and using 
> code 
> > > that we've written.
> > > 
> > > The quick answer is to include this line after the original vt 
> > > variable 
> > > 
> > > Vt:=Max(vt,. 0000001);
> > > 
> > > So it should look like this:
> > > 
> > > Vt:=(Stdev(C, 5)/Mov(Stdev( C,5),10,S) )*10;
> > > Vt:=Max(vt,. 0000001);
> > > 
> > > The DMX discussion was a sentinel event because it introduced 
> > > concepts that could be used in so many different ways. In it we 
> > > introduced DLL's, the DMZ indicator, several DMI indicators and 
> > > bipolar indexing. Seems that we did address the division by zero 
> > > error then although it may have been in the context of the DMI 
> and 
> > > not the DMZ. 
> > > 
> > > The original DMX discussion started with a question on archived 
> > post 
> > > number 18862 and my answers began with archived post number 
> 18868. 
> > > This was around August 9th of 2005. 
> > > 
> > > A quick review:
> > > * The DMI is the same as a RSI with variable periods based on 
> > > volatility
> > > * The DMX is Jurik's low lag version of the DMI 
> > > * The DMZ is my version of Jurik's DMX
> > > * Corey Saxe and Jose originally wrote versions of the DMI 
> without 
> > > DLL's
> > > * A DLL allows you to use variable inputs where they could not 
> > > normally be used
> > > 
> > > I can't be certain about how close the DMZ is to Mark Jurik's 
> DMX 
> > > but know that Mark was once a member of this group and maybe he 
> > > would be willing to verify it.
> > > 
> > > Here is a another version of the DMZ. It uses the variable RSI 
> > DLL . 
> > > 
> > > Enjoy! 
> > > 
> > > Preston
> > > 
> > > 
> > > {(DMZ)Dynamic Momentum Index} 
> > > {similar to the Jurik DMX- a lowlag DMI} 
> > > {written by Preston Umrysh} 
> > > {This indicator uses Dll software developed by MetaStock Forum 
> > Crew} 
> > > {http://forum. equis.com)} 
> > > Vt:=(Stdev(C, 5)/Mov(Stdev( C,5),10,E) )*10; 
> > > Vt:=Max(vt,. 0000001); 
> > > Period:= Input("ZeroLag Period",1,250, 10); 
> > > EMA1:= Mov(C,Period, E); 
> > > EMA2:= Mov(EMA1,Period, E); 
> > > Difference:= EMA1 - EMA2; 
> > > ZeroLagEMA:= EMA1 + Difference; 
> > > x:=ZeroLagEMA; 
> > > ExtFml( "ForumDLL.VarRSI" ,x ,vt) 
> > > {end}
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com, "Kevin and Heather 
> Howard" 
> > > <kjhoward@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Preston,
> > > > 
> > > > You posted the codes below last August and I have only now
> > > > had a chance to have a play with them. On first blush they 
> seem 
> > to 
> > > > be very good, so thank you for sharing.
> > > > 
> > > > I notice however when set as indicators within a template,
> > > > that when opening charts, I receive consistent error 
> > > > warnings: "Division by zero errors".
> > > > 
> > > > Is there anyway with your metastock wizardry, that these
> > > > division by zero warnings can be reduced or eliminated?
> > > > 
> > > > Again my thanks for posting the codes in the first instance.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Kevin
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > There are bold mushroom pickers and there are old mushroom 
> > pickers,
> > > > but there are no bold old mushroom pickers.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com 
> > > [mailto:equismetast ock@ yahoogroups. com]
> > > > On Behalf Of pumrysh
> > > > Sent: Friday, 12 August 2005 2:03 AM
> > > > To: equismetastock@ yahoogroups. com
> > > > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: DMX
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > sumamura,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Try one of these and see which one comes the closest. Two 
> > versions 
> > > > here. Version A does not allow DMI periods to be set and has 
> > > limited 
> > > > lag periods. Version B gives more flexibility by utilizing 
> some 
> > of 
> > > > Jose's coding techniques. You will need to compare these to 
> > > Jurik's 
> > > > DMX to see which one comes closer.
> > > > 
> > > > Preston
> > > > 
> > > > {Dynamic Momentum Xa (DMX)}
> > > > {version A - Does not allow DMI periods to be set}
> > > > {A low lag version of DMI written by Preston Umrysh}
> > > > {Indicator uses Dll developed by MetaStock Forum Crew }
> > > > {Available at <http://forum. equis.com> }
> > > > {For personal use only }
> > > > x:=Input("normal ouput=1 Biplolar index=2",1,2, 1);
> > > > Period:= Input("ZeroLag Period ",1,6,5);
> > > > {Division errors occur with lag beyond 6}
> > > > EMA1:= Mov(C,Period, E);
> > > > EMA2:= Mov(EMA1,Period, E);
> > > > Difference:= EMA1 - EMA2;
> > > > Z:= EMA1 + Difference;
> > > > Vt:=(Stdev(C, 5)/Mov(Stdev( C,5),10,S) )*10;
> > > > Umom:=If(Z>Ref( Z,-1),Z-Ref( Z,-1),0);
> > > > Dmom:=If(Z<Ref( Z,-1),Ref( Z,-1)-Z,0) ;
> > > > UPS:= ExtFml( "ForumDll.VarSUM" , Umom,Vt);
> > > > DNS:= ExtFml( "ForumDll.VarSUM" , Dmom,Vt);
> > > > SumU:=ExtFml( "ForumDll. VarMOV",UPS, Vt,e)/Vt;
> > > > SumD:=ExtFml( "ForumDll. VarMOV",DNS, Vt,e)/Vt;
> > > > RS:=SumU/SumD;
> > > > DMnm:=100-(100/ (1+RS));
> > > > DMIn:=(SumU- SumD)/(SumU+ SumD);
> > > > SDM:=If(x=1, DMnm,DMin) ;
> > > > PLOT:=Input( "[1]WMA [2]Wilders", 1,2,2);
> > > > SPD:= Input("Final Smoothing Periods",1,100, 3);
> > > > X:=Mov(SDM,SPD, W);{weighted}
> > > > Y:=Wilders(SDM, SPD);{wilders}
> > > > If(PLOT=1,X, Y)
> > > > {end}
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > {Dynamic Momentum Xb (DMX)} 
> > > > {version B - Allows DMI periods to be set}
> > > > {A low lag version of DMI written by Preston Umrysh}
> > > > {Indicator uses Dll developed by MetaStock Forum Crew }
> > > > {Available at <http://forum. equis.com> }
> > > > {with coding ideas from Jose Silva }
> > > > {<http://www.metastoc ktools.com> }
> > > > {For personal use only }
> > > > pds:=Input(" DMI PERIODS",6,100, 14);
> > > > Period:= Input("Lag Period ",1,50,10);
> > > > EMA1:= Mov(C,Period, E);
> > > > EMA2:= Mov(EMA1,Period, E);
> > > > Difference:= EMA1 - EMA2;
> > > > X:= EMA1 + Difference;
> > > > Vt:=Stdev(x, 5)/Mov(Stdev( x,5),10,S) ;
> > > > pds:=pds/(Vt+ .14142);
> > > > pds:=If(pds> Cum(IsDefined( x))-13,
> > > > Cum(IsDefined( x))-13,pds) ;
> > > > pds:=If(pds< 2,2,pds);
> > > > Up:=If(x>Ref( x,-1),x-Ref( x,-1),0);
> > > > Dw:=If(x<Ref( x,-1),Ref( x,-1)-x,0) ;
> > > > PDX:=ExtFml( "ForumDll. VarMOV",Up, pds,e);
> > > > MDX:=ExtFml( "ForumDll. VarMOV",Dw, pds,e);
> > > > DSPL:=Input( "[1]Normal [2]Bipolar", 1,2,1);
> > > > PLOT:=Input( "[1]WMA [2]Wilders", 1,2,2);
> > > > SPD:= Input("Final Smoothing Periods",1,100, 3);
> > > > CDM:=PDX/ MDX;
> > > > NDM:=100-(100/ (1+CDM));
> > > > BDM:=100*(PDX - MDX)/
> > > > (PDX + MDX);
> > > > SDM:=If(DSPL= 1,NDM,BDM) ;
> > > > X:=Mov(SDM,SPD, W);{weighted}
> > > > Y:=Wilders(SDM, SPD);{wilders}
> > > > If(PLOT=1,X, Y)
> > > > {end}
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger .
yahoo.com 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/