[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] ICE plug-in Tables of threshold information



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Will do!!!!
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  <A title=no_reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">manohohman 
  To: <A 
  title=equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 5:45 
  PM
  Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] ICE 
  plug-in Tables of threshold information
  On the tables of threshold ranges, I was told Adaptick will 
  email a pdf file to all of the purchasers as revisions to the manual are 
  made. I've also ask them to create a pdf file that lists all of the 
  indicators and which category they belong to. That tabble is 
  important so I hope it doesn't take too long. A couple of emails to them 
  asking for it might help to speed it up a bit.JO--- In 
  equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bill Hebert" <billhebert@xxxx> 
  wrote:> Jo,> > On the tables and threshold 
  information,  any idea on how Adaptik intends to let current> 
  owners know when it is avaiolable and where to get it.> > -- 
  Bill>   ----- Original Message ----- >   
  From: manohohman >   To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >   Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:50 
  PM>   Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] ICE plug-in JO goes to 
  the movies with Roger Ebert> > >   Well, 
  Jay, I haven't known you to make many smart ass remarks. I 
  >   could answer your's with one of my own but I won't 
  bother. If you >   don't like ICE, ask Adaptick for a refund. 
  It's not that difficult to >   do. > 
  >   Why would you need the formulas in ICE? After you have 
  run the >   optimization on an indicator, if you need to test 
  it in your own >   formulas, most of the indicators have the 
  code already written for >   them. The program is for the 
  vast majority of MS users who can't >   write any code, and 
  don't particularly want to learn.> >   There's a 
  systematic way of using the product. If you follow the >   
  methodology you can improve the performance of indicators or systems. 
  >   To do so, you've got to spend a lot time crunching 
  numbers, but in >   the end the data is worthwhile. I've 
  gotten some really good >   information out of the product. 
  It saved me a lot of time. I didn't >   follow all the 
  recommendations it generated. I didn't necessarily use 
  >   the best performing indicator identified by the system's 
  tester, and >   I settled on my thresholds using 
  observations rather than numerical >   optimization. 
  > >   The product is not perfect. The manual is 
  missing some key >   information on thresholds and a couple 
  of other tables that would >   make things easier. When I 
  asked about this stuff, Adaptick people >   said they 
  would finish those tables and threshold information and >   
  send it out. It's a time consuming piece of software to use, but then 
  >   again, system writing and testing is time consuming also. 
  > >   I'm always amazed how much bitching goes on when 
  someone who writes a >   time consuming, expensive piece 
  of software won't give the buyer the >   code. Microsoft 
  doesn't give you the code either. Have you written >   
  them a complaint letter?> >   Every one of the 
  plug-ins and add-ons is liked, or disliked, by >   someone. A 
  lot of people have complaints about MS, but in every >   
  survey it comes out on top. Several of Equis's add-ons and plug-ins 
  >   have won awards and been voted number one by users. 
  What's up with >   that? All I ever hear is how they're 
  all a piece of crap! > >   I think the problem is 
  there never has been, nor will there ever be, >   a 
  product that meets everyone's needs. I told you what I liked about 
  >   the product and what I didn't. I can't say if it will fix 
  your >   particular problems. > >   
  In my case, I've gotten way more than 99 bucks worth of benefit from 
  >   the product. In your case, it sounds like you didn't. I'd 
  ask for >   that refund. > >   
  Reviewing software is like reviewing movies. Not everyone is going to 
  >   agree, but I doubt they would tell you to get a refund 
  from Roger >   Ebert if you didn't like a movie he 
  recommended.> >   JO> > > 
  > > >   --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
  JayTownsend@xxxx wrote:>   > <<...and I look forward 
  to trying it out when it arrives.>>>   > 
  >   > You don't have to wait for it's arrival, you can 
  download it as >   soon as you >   > 
  order it.  If you are comfortable with JO's recommendations, then 
  >   perhaps you >   > can get your money 
  back from him if you don't like it.>   > 
  >   > Jay> > 
  >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
  >               
  ADVERTISEMENT>              
  >        
  >        > 
  >   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:>   equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  > > >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
  the Yahoo! Terms of Service.To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.