|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jayson,
I don't know, this appears to be a serious threat! I think we should
begin to consider a legal defense fund for Henry.
BTW: I find it quite intrigueing that "millions" are aware of this.
Preston
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jayson" <jcasavant@xxxx>
wrote:
> Oh, for crying out loud!!!
>
> spam ( P ) Pronunciation Key (spm)n.
> Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent
indiscriminately to
> multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail.
> Did anyone solicit your email?? Since you are asking for personal
> information at your site (which opens the door to your selling that
> information) can you deny commercial possibilities? As you have
posted to
> newsgroups which re-mail to multiple individuals can you possibly
deny that
> your mail has been sent to multiple individuals?
>
> Get over it! the clear majority of users responding to
Henry's "Silly little
> poll" do not want to see your your posts. There is no defamation
your posts
> have clearly met the definition of Spam and therefore you have met
the
> definition of "Spammer" Get over it. and enjoy this and other sites
as
> Anibal Archenti but not as a representative of WWW.Stockpamdic.com.
>
> BTW .com clearly indicates a Commercial presence
>
>
> Jayson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anibal Archenti [mailto:anibalarchenti@x...]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Metastockusers-
owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Metastockusers] RE:www.stockspamdic.com
>
>
>
> Mr. Kaczmarczyk doesn't realize that to label another person at the
open
> web, where everybody can read his opinion, is a defamation and
therefore it
> is against the law.
> I can't understand how a so negligent person may be owner of a site
related
> to metastock, or any other serious subject at Yahoo groups.
> Probably his fault would not be serious if he express his opinions
inside
> his group, but when he label another person in a free access page
he risks
> to receive a letter from a lawyer.
> It doesn't matter if my methodology is or not relate to metastock,
it doesn'
> t matter if it is a black box and it doesn't matter if I use a
server in
> Haiti or in China, the situation is that Mr. Kaczmarczyk is not
free to
> express his opinion about my person where millions of other people
can
> access to it.
> I will not write my opinion of Mr. Kaczmarczyk neither at the web
nor at his
> group because I respect the individuals rights and I don't want to
offend
> him in public.
> I think he haven't the courage to recognize he made a mistake and to
> apologize and he hide himself behind a useless opinion poll (even
if
> everybody in metastockusers agree with him that doesn't give him
the right
> to insult another person in public)
> Thanks to those who have given a good opinion about my site
answering his
> useless opinion poll, and of course this will be my last
communication to
> this group, I'm sorry you have to tolerate this kind of moderator.
Of course
> all of you are still welcome to stockspamdic
>
> Mr. Kaczmarczyk: this is the last time I ask you in a polite way
that you
> erase your opinion about me from free access pages in the web.
>
> Anibal Archenti
> www.stockspamdic.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|