|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Who is your Data feed service? Have you upgraded your symbols? Have you called Technical Support?
Debra
Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx------------------------------------------------------------------------There are 18 messages in this issue.Topics in this digest:1. Metastock 8.00 Enhanced System test programme errorFrom: "yellowstoneuk" 2. Problems with 8.0?From: "Lily95" 3. simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?From: "Tom Sprunger" 4. RE: Metastock 8.00 Enhanced System test programme errorFrom: "RR" 5. Metastock started a war against they costumersFrom: "Pablo Paolucci" 6. Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersFrom: "wavemechanic" 7. Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersFrom: "Pablo Paolucci" 8. Re: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?From: "DAVID H. LINTON" 9. Re: Waht is the reasonable success rate of a transaction?From: "Essan Soobratty" 10. Intraday data - eSignal vs QchartsFrom: "Gary" 11. Re: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?From: "Tom Sprunger" 12. RE: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?From: "RR" 13. Re: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?From: "Roy Larsen" 14. Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersFrom: -= Chris ß =- 15. Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersFrom: "Pablo Paolucci" 16. Succesful system testFrom: Lars Widlund 17. Metastock pro 8 and LinuxFrom: Lars Widlund 18. RE: Waht is the reasonable success rate of a transaction?From: "SR" ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 1Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 14:19:04 -0000From: "yellowstoneuk" Subject: Metastock 8.00 Enhanced System test programme errorI have just upgraded from Metastock 7.2 to version 8.0. Unfortunately I am receiving a programme error dialogue when I try to do a system test, whether it be one system or a few, on a number of stocks. The message is :----Description: Invalid argument.File: ST_RecordsetIterator.cpp Line: 259 Error Type: 0Error Code: 2I would welcome advice from anyone who has come across the problem and has a solution. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 2Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 10:43:02 -0600From: "Lily95" Subject: Problems with 8.0?Ever since I installed 8.0 Pro, I have a time lag when I plot indicators, move lines etc.. I am using Windows XP and my computer is large enough for the software. Anyone else having this problem?Thanks, Lily[This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 3Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:32:22 -0600From: "Tom Sprunger" Subject: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?Roy, where do I find how to simulate the Security function with MS EOD thatyou describe below?ThanksTom----- Original Message -----From: "Roy Larsen" To: Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 2:38 PMSubject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re: Correlation Exploration?> David>> The section called "Roll Your own Indexes" on Page 64 of theFormulaBook.pdf> tells you how to create an index using the "Create Composite" function in> the DownLoader. See the files section of this forum for the file. There is> also a way of simulating the Security() function with MS EOD which I can> explain on the TE forum.>> Roy>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 4Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:27:27 -0600From: "RR" Subject: RE: Metastock 8.00 Enhanced System test programme errorYou may need to re-install Metastock 8.0 as I have seen a similiar error.Use www.browsertune.com to check out your IE 6.0 browser; this wasnot working well at all after MS8.0 upgraded the 5.5 browser. I installedthe IE6.0 sp1 patch and this resolved the IE issues; but I still found someerrors in the system tester.-----Original Message-----From: yellowstoneuk [mailto:yellowstoneuk@xxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 8:19 AMTo: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [Metastockusers] Metastock 8.00 Enhanced System test programmeerrorI have just upgraded from Metastock 7.2 to version 8.0.Unfortunately I am receiving a programme error dialogue when I tryto do a system test, whether it be one system or a few, on a numberof stocks. The message is :----Description: Invalid argument.File: ST_RecordsetIterator.cppLine: 259Error Type: 0Error Code: 2I would welcome advice from anyone who has come across the problemand has a solution.Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENTTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.[This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 5Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:33:12 -0300From: "Pablo Paolucci" Subject: Metastock started a war against they costumersMetastock started a policy of forcing ebay to ban the metastock soft or plugins for MS auctions, they dont care if you have your costumer number, and they even banned auctions on sealed brand new metastock 8 packages.This is another way to force people to look for new horizons, why should i bought the new metastock if i know that i pay 1600 usd and when the new version comes up i have to pay a lot without the benefit of being able to sell my own copy?Well advanced get and dynamic trader are the only ones that ill be willing to pay for upgrades from now onBye[This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 6Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:58:44 -0500From: "wavemechanic" Subject: Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersPablo:Did you upgrade to DT4? If so, any problems with the Log function?Bill----- Original Message ----- From: Pablo Paolucci To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 3:33 PMSubject: [Metastockusers] Metastock started a war against they costumersMetastock started a policy of forcing ebay to ban the metastock soft or plugins for MS auctions, they dont care if you have your costumer number, and they even banned auctions on sealed brand new metastock 8 packages.This is another way to force people to look for new horizons, why should i bought the new metastock if i know that i pay 1600 usd and when the new version comes up i have to pay a lot without the benefit of being able to sell my own copy?Well advanced get and dynamic trader are the only ones that ill be willing to pay for upgrades from now onByeYahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENTTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 7Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:16:13 -0300From: "Pablo Paolucci" Subject: Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersTHe only problem i found was when i made a work around to use it in a second computer i coudlnt use the portfolio manager directly i had to go to the instlaion folder and ran it from thereBye----- Original Message ----- From: wavemechanic To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 5:58 PMSubject: Re: [Metastockusers] Metastock started a war against they costumersPablo:Did you upgrade to DT4? If so, any problems with the Log function?Bill----- Original Message ----- From: Pablo Paolucci To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 3:33 PMSubject: [Metastockusers] Metastock started a war against they costumersMetastock started a policy of forcing ebay to ban the metastock soft or plugins for MS auctions, they dont care if you have your costumer number, and they even banned auctions on sealed brand new metastock 8 packages.This is another way to force people to look for new horizons, why should i bought the new metastock if i know that i pay 1600 usd and when the new version comes up i have to pay a lot without the benefit of being able to sell my own copy?Well advanced get and dynamic trader are the only ones that ill be willing to pay for upgrades from now onByeTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENTTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 8Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:21:56 -0500From: "DAVID H. LINTON" Subject: Re: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?TomAs Roy said in his post, go to page 64 of the Formula Primer posted in thefiles section of this forum to find "Roll Your own Indexes".It is an acceptable method if you need only a few custom indices with only afew stocks in each. It is labour intensive to create a lot of indices eachwith a lot of stocks this way.However, it appears to be the only answer with MS EOD.If you find a better answer, please post.Also, others may have created this indices you are looking for and theresults may be exportable, swappable.David----- Original Message -----From: "Tom Sprunger" To: Sent: November 30, 2002 12:32 PMSubject: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?> Roy, where do I find how to simulate the Security function with MS EODthat> you describe below?> Thanks>> Tom> ----- Original Message -----> From: "Roy Larsen" > To: > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 2:38 PM> Subject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re: Correlation Exploration?>>> > David> >> > The section called "Roll Your own Indexes" on Page 64 of the> FormulaBook.pdf> > tells you how to create an index using the "Create Composite" functionin> > the DownLoader. See the files section of this forum for the file. Thereis> > also a way of simulating the Security() function with MS EOD which I can> > explain on the TE forum.> >> > Roy> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 9Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:27:39 -0600From: "Essan Soobratty" Subject: Re: Waht is the reasonable success rate of a transaction?I may be wrong, but this stream of comments regarding "dupascopy.con" soundssuspiciously like subliminal SPAM!----- Original Message -----From: "fromstar2001" To: Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:25 PMSubject: [Metastockusers] Waht is the reasonable success rate of atransaction?> I just wonder what the reasonable success rate of a given transaction> is. At dukascopy.com they keep publishing someone's portfolio with> absolutely staggering success rate. This mysterious someone has made> nearly 2 mln$ of profit and his success rate is about 80% on> average. I now it sounds too good to be true, but I have been a> dukascopy user for quite a long while and i know that theirs is a> serious site. Indeed, they are keen on implementing quantum physics> methods in technical analysis, and i know they deal in serious> science. but i also know that the idea of serious science is not> compatible with the above results. What to believe? can anyone> advise me on this subject? Can 80% of successful transactions go hand> in hand with scientific investigation and analysis?>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 10Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:32:16 -0000From: "Gary" Subject: Intraday data - eSignal vs QchartsI'm a new MetaStock Professional 8.0 user, having major problems with the eSignal data feed (ver 7.1). The eSignal WINROS.exe application always crashed on my Windows 98 installation (page faults), and still does the same after upgrading to Windows 2000. Both Windows installations were completely up-to-date re: service packs and hot fixes. Winros.exe crashes whether feeding eSignal or MetaStock, so it seems it's an eSignal problem. The error message in Win98 indicated the winros.exe was conflicting with mfc42.dll, and eSignal tech support (as well as Equis tech support) have pointed toward multiple copies of various dll's with different release dates. However, I've tried every possible permutation of the dll's with no effect. So far eSignal has not been able to give any further help (except for the "not our problem, talk to Microsoft" suggestion - you can imagine how helpful that would be).Questions:1) Has anyone else been having problems with the eSignal 7.1 data feed to MetaStock 8.0, generating fatal errors and crashing the data feed? Anyone know of any other ideas on fixing it - configuration, dll's, registry, etc, etc?2) Any opinions on QCharts vs eSignal as an intraday data feed for Metastock 8.0.Thanks.Gary________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 11Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:49:51 -0600From: "Tom Sprunger" Subject: Re: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?Thanks, this is good to build indexes, but I'm interested to see if Roy hasfound a way to simulate the Security() function. For this I'd like toreference an indicator in different security in a system test. For example,I'm testing security A and would like to buy if the RSI crosses above S onsecurity B. Supposedly the security function in the Pro version will dothis. I know you can drag and use the P variable, but sometimes the Pvariable doesn't work properly.Tom----- Original Message -----From: "DAVID H. LINTON" To: Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 3:21 PMSubject: Re: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MS EOD???Roy?> Tom> As Roy said in his post, go to page 64 of the Formula Primer posted in the> files section of this forum to find "Roll Your own Indexes".> It is an acceptable method if you need only a few custom indices with onlya> few stocks in each. It is labour intensive to create a lot of indices each> with a lot of stocks this way.> However, it appears to be the only answer with MS EOD.> If you find a better answer, please post.> Also, others may have created this indices you are looking for and the> results may be exportable, swappable.> David> ----- Original Message -----> From: "Tom Sprunger" > To: > Sent: November 30, 2002 12:32 PM> Subject: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MS EOD???Roy?>>> > Roy, where do I find how to simulate the Security function with MS EOD> that> > you describe below?> > Thanks> >> > Tom> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: "Roy Larsen" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 2:38 PM> > Subject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re: Correlation Exploration?> >> >> > > David> > >> > > The section called "Roll Your own Indexes" on Page 64 of the> > FormulaBook.pdf> > > tells you how to create an index using the "Create Composite" function> in> > > the DownLoader. See the files section of this forum for the file.There> is> > > also a way of simulating the Security() function with MS EOD which Ican> > > explain on the TE forum.> > >> > > Roy> > >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> > Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> >> >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 12Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:41:22 -0600From: "RR" Subject: RE: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?Your options:1) Upgrade to MetaStock Pro2) Use the composite feature and build your data in this manner whenpossible.3) Use the P variable4) Use another package like Technifilter Plus which supports this type offunctionality.5) Use some other outside tools which builds a synthetic security in ASCIIformatthat represents what you want to do and then use the downloader tocreate the"security".6) Buy the developer's kit and build your own version of the Securityfunction7) others?-----Original Message-----From: Tom Sprunger [mailto:tlsprunger@xxxxxxxxx]Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 3:50 PMTo: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MSEOD??? Roy?Thanks, this is good to build indexes, but I'm interested to see if Royhasfound a way to simulate the Security() function. For this I'd like toreference an indicator in different security in a system test. Forexample,I'm testing security A and would like to buy if the RSI crosses above S onsecurity B. Supposedly the security function in the Pro version will dothis. I know you can drag and use the P variable, but sometimes the Pvariable doesn't work properly.Tom----- Original Message -----From: "DAVID H. LINTON" To: Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 3:21 PMSubject: Re: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MSEOD???Roy?> Tom> As Roy said in his post, go to page 64 of the Formula Primer posted inthe> files section of this forum to find "Roll Your own Indexes".> It is an acceptable method if you need only a few custom indices withonlya> few stocks in each. It is labour intensive to create a lot of indiceseach> with a lot of stocks this way.> However, it appears to be the only answer with MS EOD.> If you find a better answer, please post.> Also, others may have created this indices you are looking for and the> results may be exportable, swappable.> David> ----- Original Message -----> From: "Tom Sprunger" > To: > Sent: November 30, 2002 12:32 PM> Subject: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MS EOD???Roy?>>> > Roy, where do I find how to simulate the Security function with MS EOD> that> > you describe below?> > Thanks> >> > Tom> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: "Roy Larsen" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 2:38 PM> > Subject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re: Correlation Exploration?> >> >> > > David> > >> > > The section called "Roll Your own Indexes" on Page 64 of the> > FormulaBook.pdf> > > tells you how to create an index using the "Create Composite"function> in> > > the DownLoader. See the files section of this forum for the file.There> is> > > also a way of simulating the Security() function with MS EOD which Ican> > > explain on the TE forum.> > >> > > Roy> > >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> > Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> >> >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENTTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.[This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 13Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:09:20 +1300From: "Roy Larsen" Subject: Re: simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?TomSee off list at mail.Roy----- Original Message -----From: "Tom Sprunger" To: Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 6:32 AMSubject: [Metastockusers] simulating Security() function with MS EOD??? Roy?> Roy, where do I find how to simulate the Security function with MS EODthat> you describe below?> Thanks>> Tom> ----- Original Message -----> From: "Roy Larsen" > To: > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 2:38 PM> Subject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re: Correlation Exploration?>>> > David> >> > The section called "Roll Your own Indexes" on Page 64 of the> FormulaBook.pdf> > tells you how to create an index using the "Create Composite" functionin> > the DownLoader. See the files section of this forum for the file. Thereis> > also a way of simulating the Security() function with MS EOD which I can> > explain on the TE forum.> >> > Roy> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 14Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 00:25:01 -0500From: -= Chris ß =- Subject: Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersThe answer is Amibroker!www.amibroker.com After 30 days, you'll never look back.-= Chris ß =-Using FastTrack/FastRUBE/FastTools/Trade/EZPnF/PSM/AmibrokerFastBreakPro/SpeedResearch/AgentMetaStock user since v 0.9, to 7.2.... then discovered AB .On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:33:12 -0300, you wrote:> Metastock started a policy of forcing ebay to ban the metastock soft or plugins for MS auctions, they dont care if you have your costumer number, and they even banned auctions on sealed brand new metastock 8 packages.> This is another way to force people to look for new horizons, why should i bought the new metastock if i know that i pay 1600 usd and when the new version comes up i have to pay a lot without the benefit of being able to sell my own copy?> Well advanced get and dynamic trader are the only ones that ill be willing to pay for upgrades from now on> > Bye________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 15Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 03:30:41 -0300From: "Pablo Paolucci" Subject: Re: Metastock started a war against they costumersChris , i know that you like amibroker, but i must say that a betteralternative is advanced get, dt 4 and wealth lab, this group of toolstogether are simply top of the trading soft groupByePS i know that the price of amibroker is just a fraction----- Original Message -----From: "-= Chris ß =-" To: Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 2:25 AMSubject: Re: [Metastockusers] Metastock started a war against they costumersThe answer is Amibroker!www.amibroker.comAfter 30 days, you'll never look back.-= Chris ß =-Using FastTrack/FastRUBE/FastTools/Trade/EZPnF/PSM/AmibrokerFastBreakPro/SpeedResearch/AgentMetaStock user since v 0.9, to 7.2.... then discovered AB .On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:33:12 -0300, you wrote:> Metastock started a policy of forcing ebay to ban the metastock soft orplugins for MS auctions, they dont care if you have your costumer number,and they even banned auctions on sealed brand new metastock 8 packages.> This is another way to force people to look for new horizons, why should ibought the new metastock if i know that i pay 1600 usd and when the newversion comes up i have to pay a lot without the benefit of being able tosell my own copy?> Well advanced get and dynamic trader are the only ones that ill be willingto pay for upgrades from now on>> ByeTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 16Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 12:59:35 +0100From: Lars Widlund Subject: Succesful system testHello.I have made an system tester that seems to be very succesful. 98,8% winning trades but I think something is wrong.Is there someone who can help me to discover what is wrong.Lars.System notes Enter long IND:=StochMomentum(34,1,1); FAST:= IND; SLOW:=Mov(IND,2,W); Cross(FAST,SLOW)AND FAST>SLOW ; Close long IND:=StochMomentum(34,1,1); FAST:= IND; SLOW:=Mov(IND,2,W); Cross(SLOW,FAST)AND FAST Breakeven stop Long positions only. Floor level at 0.0 Points. Inactivity stop Long positions only. Minimum change of 0.0 Points over 0 periods. Trailing stop Long positions only. Profit risk of 5 Percent, ignoring 0 periods. Profit target stop Long positions only. Profit target of 0.0 Points. Maximum loss stop Long positions only. Maximum loss of 5 Percent. Initial equity 10000 Positions Long Entry trade price Low Entry trade delay 0 Exit trade price High Exit trade delay 0 Entry commission 10 points Exit commission 10 points Interest rate 3.1% Margin req. 100% ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 17Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 13:51:39 +0100From: Lars Widlund Subject: Metastock pro 8 and LinuxHello. Does anyone know if Metastock Pro 8 works in Linux? Can I install metastock pro 8 in several computers whitout any problem or can I only install it in one computer. I nedd it in my 2 desktop and in my laptop.Lars________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 18Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:56:06 +0200From: "SR" Subject: RE: Waht is the reasonable success rate of a transaction?fromstar2001,can you please write the link to this user's published portfolio?I don't mean the dukascopy.com site. I mean the direct link to theportfolio.I have been in their site but I have not been able to find the specificpage.I was in a hurry.BTW I have downloaded the software but the version I have does not look likethe one theyhave on-line. I asked them about that but did not get a reply.Have you also tried the download? And if yes have you also noticed thisdifference?In my opinion a success rate of 80% is hard to get at but not impossible.It depends on other factors, too, for example the %gain, thenumber of trades etc.I cannot doubt the described performance, since I have not enough evidencefor that.I just say it is difficult.SpyrosMessage: 4Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:25:56 -0000From: "fromstar2001" Subject: Waht is the reasonable success rate of a transaction?I just wonder what the reasonable success rate of a given transactionis. At dukascopy.com they keep publishing someone's portfolio withabsolutely staggering success rate. This mysterious someone has madenearly 2 mln$ of profit and his success rate is about 80% onaverage. I now it sounds too good to be true, but I have been adukascopy user for quite a long while and i know that theirs is aserious site. Indeed, they are keen on implementing quantum physicsmethods in technical analysis, and i know they deal in seriousscience. but i also know that the idea of serious science is notcompatible with the above results. What to believe? can anyoneadvise me on this subject? Can 80% of successful transactions go handin hand with scientific investigation and analysis?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
<font face=arial
size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT<img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N879.ameritrade.yahoo/B1054521.11;sz=300x250;adc=ZHS;ord=1038784742?"; alt="" width="300" height="250"
border="0">
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|