[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dumb questions



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

The answer to the dumb question is yes.  Look for breaks below previous low 
and violations of trend lines.  Those are the tools that I use.

Dan


>From: Mullin285@xxxxxxx
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Dumb questions
>Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:41:45 EST
>
>Hey!!! I wanted to ask that question. No wait, it's too good a question for
>me to ask. :)
>
>Just kidding of course.
>
>Chris
>
>In a message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:26:25 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>"Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
><< speaking of dumb questions how about "are there any rules that one can 
>use
>to decide when a correction has turned into a reversal?"
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:24 PM
>Subject: Re: too much for me--lets get on with it
>
>
> > I certainly do not want to be negative or keep any negativity alive but
>..
> > IMHO the issue is not related to technical disagreements. It seems to me
>that
> > it is much more related to civilness, humaness ...
> > Forums like this are designed for exchanges of ideas, preferably in a
>civil
> > and nurturing manner. When people are criticized, rebuked and called 
>nasty
> > names for asking a question or giving their opinion, there is a tendency
>to
> > stifle a lot of other peoples contributions.
> > I am not trying to keep this going, just trying to ensure the issue is
> > defined properly.
> > I feel that the best way for me to contribute is to ask the dumb 
>questions
> > that everybody else is too embarassed to ask. So ... let me go think of
>some
> > really dumb questions now. Any ideas from any one? :)
> > Chris
> >
> > In a message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2000  6:48:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> > "Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > << Hey, lets just get on with it ok? whoever is at fault, there is a lot
>more
> > to be gained by exchange of good ideas (how will one know something is
>good
> > unless there is something less good to compare it with?) and a whole lot
>to
> > be learnt.
> >
> > Lets all continue to make this a good active vibrant and intelligent
>forum.
> >
> >
> > Vignesh
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:13 AM
> > Subject: Re: Too much for me
> >
> >
> > > I wouldn't worry about it.  As long as Equis's MetaStock program is
> > popular,
> > > there will be a MetaStock ListServ.  The only way this List will
>disappear
> > > would be if no one purchased the product any more.  There will always 
>be
> > > changeovers in people for whatever reasons.  Some will go broke, some
>will
> > move
> > > on to better programs, some will find better forums such as Silicon
> > Investor,
> > > etc...
> > >
> > > Let's just ignore the negative and focus on building our skills in
> > MetaStock
> > > and TA in general.  I have much to contribute and learn.  I know 
>others
> > here
> > > will do the same.
> > >
> > > Daniel.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ron Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is exactly what I've been thinking would happen, that people
>would
> > be
> > > > driven off or leave in disgust. This list of traders has been ruined
>by
> > the
> > > > few who can't handle the fact that others have different views.
> > Complaining
> > > > to Equis about the problem didn't do any good, so maybe you should 
>go.
> > > > There is a very uncomfortable feeling about this list, and posting 
>to
>it
> > > > takes almost as much guts as making a trade!  But at least you won't
> > find
> > > > support for an unprofitable idea! hahaha   However, there are some
>very
> > > > smart and nice people on the list, I guess they just have developed 
>a
> > thick
> > > > skin.
> > > >
> > > > Ron Scott
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Thompson
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 7:57 AM
> > > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Too much for me
> > > >
> > > > Would someone please tell me where I can sign up for realtraders?  I
> > can't
> > > > take this anymore.  It is time to make a switch.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:12 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Blind bats, old ladies, and one giant turd.
> > > >
> > > > > I have to agree, sad to say. I feel many folks are probably 
>nervous
> > about
> > > > > getting whiplashed by some of the vicious, obnoxiousness that 
>often
> > times
> > > > > stinks up so many posts on this list.
> > >
> >
> >  >>
> >
> >
>
>  >>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.