|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi!
If anyone want to see past or future examples
of Advanced Get analysis go to:- MOST RECENT Trader's Outlooks <A
href="http://markets.tradingtech.com/";>http://markets.tradingtech.com/ and
decide for your self. I'm satisfied owner of GET. Not too many TA software
venders show current markets using all of the tools available in their
software. MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, RSI etc. look
excellent on left side of the chart or any 'fit to software' year
1991, 1994 or 1987 chart.<FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>
regards,
Ajay
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
A.J. Maas
To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Metastock-List
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 6:05
PM
Subject: Re: Advanced Get versus
MetaStock
Please let me take a shot at unraffling this Get-myth.
MicroSoft(MS) doesn't market or creates any TA or EWAVE
software(sw).
MetaStocK(MSK) also doesn't make or includes any EWAVE counts or
sw.
I would like to see examples where this $2000+ sw package did give
you
the exact EWAVE counts? Eg TRUE examples.
Get is known to make attempts at it, but the sw
package fails hopelessly in delivering.
Not surprisingly, since its counts are not true Elliot counts but counts
based on a mix
that includes Elliot wave counts now based on the
Fibionancy-myth, a myth that here
on the List also has been unraffled before.
The option to plot the MACD in Histogram style is included in your MSK
software.
(<right click> the MACD for Properties and <click>
the wavy Bars option).
You're also enabled in MetaStocK to create any custom version of the
MACD or any
other indicator. Am sure it is one of the many MACD versions that
have been
posted to the List before.
Can you give some TRUE examples where this $2000+ sw package did give
you
the exact "next LOW's" ? Eg valid examples and/with
examples showing that Eclipse.
Get is known to
only forcast "way-off" LOW's.
$2000+ for a simple sw package is a rip-off, for a
non-delivering sw package its
is plain rip-off and not the time worth spend on it.
A quick calculation:
one(1) complete single PC + OS sw + MSK sw installed costs less
then $2000 and
on the contrairy, DOES DELIVER on expectations.
<FONT
size=2>Regards,Ton Maas<A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDismiss
the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.Homepage <A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">Van:
Songyun Fox
Aan: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Verzonden: dinsdag 17 oktober 2000
0:35
Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus
MetaStock
Hi Gene. Please let me take a shot at
your question. MS does not offer any form of Elliott wave
counts. GET does. GET offers a unique form of the MACD, in
histogram form. GET helps locate the next LOW if your peaking in price.
called an ellipse indicator I believe.
Other goodies, but I don't own it. $2,000 is
alot for a piece of software. But, if someone wants to buy me one, I'd
be very pleased. My opinion.
Bud Fox
Gene Ricci wrote:
I see a lot of MS owners using Advanced Get as
well. I would appreciate if someone could enlighten me as to why one would
use both. Thanks,<FONT
face="Comic Sans MS">Gene
|