[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Off Topic - Reputation of Merrill Lynch mutual funds



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#fffcf0>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=490510613-02111999>Hi 
all,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
class=490510613-02111999></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=490510613-02111999>I am seeking 
opinions on the reputation of Merrill Lynch tech mutual fund. For example, how 
does it compare in performance, fees etc. I am thinking of investing with them 
from the land down under. Thanks all.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><BR>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Michael Liew</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
size=2>mmliew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT> </P></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Nov 02 07:15:54 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA09656
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:17:28 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA06892
	for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:30:58 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA06889
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:30:56 -0700
Received: from harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA06057
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:35:22 -0700 (MST)
Received: from heidi (dialup-166.90.66.243.Chicago1.Level3.net [166.90.66.243])
	by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA04799
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 06:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19991102081926.006ae5b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: stubner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 08:20:01 -0600
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Heidi Stubner <stubner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Dial Data and Compuserve EOD
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

I am still  using Dial Data.  Their service is satisfactory.  The only
access is through the internet which took me a while to reconfigure my
system (because I used a delayed download) but 90% of the time it works
fine.  

The only thing I don't like about Dial Data is they are unable to pull out
incorrect data from a previous download & repost correct data as Reuters is
able to do.  I checked into changing to Reuters but during that time I
noticed that there were so many postings on how lousy their service was.  I
determined I was better off with Dial/Data.

At 10:00 AM 11/02/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>Has Dial Data improved the service? There used to be a lot of 
>caomplaining about that, but recently none is posting on that subject. Is 
>anyone still using Dial Data?
>
>Is internet downloading from Compuserve possible? I understand there were 
>some problems: have they been fixed?
>
>
>Alberto Torchio
> Torino, Italy
>
>
>
>