|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><html>
<font size=3>At 04:08 PM 1/27/99 , you wrote:<br>
>Telescan blames Equis and Equis blames Telescan for the problems
with<br>
>downloading from Telescan. This has been ongoing for several
years and no<br>
>one is working on a solution.<br>
>Telescan did tell me that the Equis Downloader was one of 2
downloaders<br>
>that give them problems. I have solved the problem by dropping
Telescan<br>
>and bypassing the Equis Downloader for downloads.<br>
><br>
>I would probably agree with Forman that Telescan are
indifferent. On the<br>
>other hand Equis has its own share of errors and omissions.
Neither is<br>
>without fault.<br>
><br>
>One of the major problems is that Equis doesnt appear to want to do a
major<br>
>overhaul. Metastock needs to be completely rewritten using
state of the<br>
>art methodologies.<br>
><br>
<br>
I heartily concur. Which raises the issue: why are we
using it?<br>
<br>
<br>
>At this point I'll get off my soapbox.<br>
><br>
>Lionel<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
\\snip<br>
</font></html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jan 27 18:08:44 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 5145
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:53:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA13043
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:06:30 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA13040
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:06:25 -0700
Received: from outerbounds.net (elmer.outerbounds.net [206.196.147.2])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA09161
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:15:09 -0700 (MST)
Received: from dell450 [206.196.147.172] by outerbounds.net [206.196.147.2] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP2.R) for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:07:55 -0700
Message-ID: <001f01be4a62$2f9cacc0$ac93c4ce@xxxxxxx>
From: "Chuck Wemlinger" <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: alligator
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:01:57 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 244c710cf1c4bbd427b063ed96354b47.02
I would really be skeptical if he said "This IS the Holy Grail".
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: ClaudB@xxxxxxx <ClaudB@xxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: alligator
>This is not to demean Bill Williams, author of "New Trading Dimensions,"
>but shouldn't we all be a little skeptical of an author who states in the
>introduction to his book "There is a Holy Grail" and he's more than willing
to
>share it with you?
>
>That is not to say that the indicators presented don't work. It's just my
>way of saying we should be somewhat skeptical of the claim stated above.
>
>ClaudB
>
|