|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=Windows-1252 http-equiv=Content-Type><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content='"MSHTML 5.00.0910.1309"' name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Rajesh Mentor writes:</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If we take the fall from 9300 to 7400 as an A-wave, this
A-wave MUST BE CORRECTIVE <BR>as it was fully retraced. In short, this
A-wave MUST BE A"3". When I say a "3", it does not
<BR>mean that it should be in 3 waves. It must be corrective, that's
all. It could be a 7-wave <BR>count, e.g. a-b-c-x-a-b-c. It would
still be a "3". Normally it would not be difficult to fit in
<BR>an alternate corrective count to the fall. It is usually difficult to
fit in an impulse count (i.e. a"5") <BR>but not a corrective
count. In the particular case under study, I just find it impossible to
fit <BR>in a corrective count and that is the reason I asked for opinions on the
matter. If your <BR>calculations resulted in a 5-wave impulsive fall from
9300 to 7400, then this CAN NEVER <BR>BE AN A-WAVE OF AN IRREGULAR FLAT.
It can only be an A-wave of a zig-zag. <BR>If it indeed was an A-wave of a
zig-zag, then the Market WOULD NEVER HAVE <BR>RETRACED THE ENTIRE FALL. So
we just have to discard that possibility until and <BR>unless somebody can come
up with a credible and satisfactory corrective wave count for the <BR>fall from
9300 to 7400. <BR>For the upward movement from 7400 or 7467 to 9380, there would
be no problem in <BR>taking it as an a-b-c-x-a-b-c (double zig-zag) corrective
wave. <BR>Coming to the C-wave, remember it CAN NEVER BE A 3-WAVE COUNT (a-b-c)
<BR>as you are taking it. A C-wave can be an a-b-c count only in a
triangle BUT NEVER IN <BR>A FLAT OR ZIG-ZAG PATTERN. It must be a
1-2-3-4-5.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To sum up, I still cannot digest the fact that the market
movement from 7400 or 7467 <BR>to 9380 completed a B-wave with a C-wave to
follow which should test the recent <BR>above mentioned market
bottom.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>------------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>To Rajesh, Mentor and all,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm sorry that I have not made myselve too clear as to the fact that my
Wave counts are</DIV>
<DIV>'eye-ball' based also from looking at the Price Indicator's Patterns over a
10 year period</DIV>
<DIV>and previous, this instead of calculating it using the real true Elliott
Counts, and as such,</DIV>
<DIV>my counts therefore not to be the real true Elliott Wave Counts.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I am pleased that your Mentor is capable to do so, and naturaly prefer his
counts over my</DIV>
<DIV>"invalid counts".</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>From my 10-year period lookback+counts at the Charts, the 1993-wave up
lasted up untill Feb94</DIV>
<DIV>and this I have then calculated as being Wave-1. Next, is its 1994
correction wave down</DIV>
<DIV>being a Wave-2 and continued in 1995 with start of a Wave-3 wich wave has
held well up untill</DIV>
<DIV>High of Jul98.</DIV>
<DIV>Wave-4 then to be in process at the moment (or as your Mentor counts it to
already have been</DIV>
<DIV>finished) and Wave-5 to start in early next year 1999 (or as your Mentor
counts it to have</DIV>
<DIV>started already since last Sep/Oct98) to last well into the year
2000.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This is were the confusion starts, as my counts did not include the
March/April Highs to be</DIV>
<DIV>the end of Wave-3 and wich was then followed down by a Corrective Wave-A of
Wave-4 into</DIV>
<DIV>Jun98 and by a Corrective Wave-B lasting up untill Jul98-High and a
Corrective Wave-C down</DIV>
<DIV>untill Sep/Oct98.</DIV>
<DIV>This then followed by a new start of the Impulsive Wave-1 up untill Nov98
and perhaps that we</DIV>
<DIV>are currently now making an Impulsive Wave-2 down to be followed soon by an
Impulsive</DIV>
<DIV>Wave-3 up well into 1999 and with an end of 1999 perhaps Wave-4 down and a
Wave-5 up</DIV>
<DIV>into the year 2000.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>As mentioned before, I let your Mentors' valid Elliott Counts naturaly
overrule my invalid counts.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks to you and your Mentor for all the time spend in this and in getting
us on his List and from</DIV>
<DIV>the length of the addressed Mentorspeak-List Listees know that it was and
has not been wasted.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>For anyone who wants to get onto the Mentorspeak List be refered to
Rajesh</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A href="mailto:demon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
size=3>demon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> (who can then forward the correct to be followed
procedures+addresses).</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best regards,</DIV>
<DIV>Ton Maas</DIV>
<DIV>ms-irb@xxxxxx</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Dec 08 08:37:02 1998
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 17354
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:22:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA03953
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 07:50:00 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA03950
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 07:49:57 -0700
Received: from aji.cisco.com (aji.cisco.com [161.44.2.31])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA01584
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 08:01:17 -0700 (MST)
Received: from qcontinuum (qcontinuum.cisco.com [161.44.98.251]) by aji.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.6.5) with SMTP id JAA18683 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 09:50:20 -0500 (EST)
From: "Sean W. Smith" <sean_smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: World's Best Macro Program - Fw: WinCron 1.32 released
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 09:50:20 -0500
Message-ID: <002501be22ba$13b086f0$fb622ca1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <014c01be22b7$3b1760e0$592879c3@xxxxx>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 6212181d8483d57b38f820ee959f90d5
Come on now. Have you ever looked at winbatch. It already has all their
"NEW" functions...
http://www.windowware.com
Sean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 8:41 AM
> To: Metastock-List
> Subject: Re: World's Best Macro Program - Fw: WinCron 1.32 released
>
>
> Follow up to previous mail introduction of WinCron v1.30 ,
> worlds easiest and best automation program.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxx
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steve Gray <sgray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <anthmaas@xxxxxx>
> Sent: zondag 6 december 1998 6:30
> Subject: WinCron 1.32 released
>
>
> WinCron 1.32 is now available. New features include:
> * $WaitWindow - wait until window opens or closes
> * $Enable/$Disable - enables or disables other tasks
> * $Dial - Starts a dial-up connection
> * Run once and delete task options
> * Improved parameter parsing
> * Updated documentation
>
> Check it out at:
> http://www.ryerson.ca/~sgray
>
> Steve
>
|