[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stock Trading Building Blocks



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Yes Jim,
Quite interested in reviewing/discussing building block details.
Thanks,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Greening <JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, November 14, 1998 8:22 PM
Subject: Stock Trading Building Blocks


>All,
>     This may be slightly out of scope in that it is a larger topic
>than just MetaStock charting and testing, although that's definitely a
>good part of it.  I thought it would be interesting to share our ideas
>on the building blocks or elements of a complete stock trading
>methodology.
>
>     I have tried to build my own trading system on what I think is a
>logical set of building blocks.  The elements of my trading system
>follow:
>1.  A systematic method of narrowing the universe of stocks to a few
>potential trading candidates that have certain characteristics that
>have resulted in successful trades in the past.  My searches or
>filters use a combination of fundamental and technical criteria.
>2.  A market tracking mechanism that indicates when it is OK to enter
>a position and whether that position should be long or short.  I use
>trend channels for this.
>3.  Tests and a methodology for making the final stock selection for
>new positions.
>4.  A money management system that limits overall portfolio risk on
>each new position and tells how large each position should be.  I
>won't risk more than 5% (usually 2 to 3%) of my portfolio on any one
>position.
>5.  A method for setting stops and targets although targets are not
>always required.  Stops should be based on Technical Analysis rather
>than an arbitrary percentage or point move.  Stop placement tied back
>to money management can affect position size.  Again, I use trend
>channels for this.
>6.  An exit strategy.  Mine is simple, exit when a target or stop is
>hit.
>
>     Does anyone have any comments on the above building blocks?  Any
>to add?  Do you disagree with any?  Is anyone interested into going
>into details on each of the building blocks?
>
>JimG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>