|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thank you sidhartha
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@xxx> wrote:
>
> PA = per annum
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "reinsley" <reinsley@> wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > Does 30%PA stands for Annual Parcentage Gain ?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > >
> > > I am happy to take 30%PA anyday and anyone who consistently gets
> > > that, anyway at all, is a qualified trader in my eyes (respect to
> > > them).
> > >
> > > My own favourite style is more aligned to yours, except I am not
> > > discretionary.
> > >
> > > Yes, I am interested in the alingment of cycles across
timeframes (I
> > > call it timeframe stacking) and it would be worth a deeper
discussion
> > > on another day.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your input and I will have a look at Hurst.
> > >
> > >
> > > brian_z
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "bilbo0211" <wjdandreta@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >>I'm referring to systems designed by optimising lookback
> > > periods.<<
> > > >
> > > > Let me start by saying I am primarily a discretionary trader and I
> > > > don't do much in the way of optimizing, I consider it curve
fitting.
> > > > When your data set changes character your optimization breaks
down.
> > > >
> > > > Using a fixed look back period is a very crude way of trading
market
> > > > cycles. For example, if you have a simple MA crossover system that
> > > > does well in a trending market (longer term cycle is dominant) it
> > > will
> > > > do poorly in a sideways choppy market (shorter term cycle is
> > > > dominant). A more refined approach is to use a variable period
that
> > > > adapts to the current dominant cycle.
> > > >
> > > > >>I'm happy to be proved wrong ...so you are saying we can achieve
> > > > better than 30-40%PA, on long term average (through various market
> > > > cycles) using 'optimisation of lookback period' techniques?
(EOD, no
> > > > leveraging).<<
> > > >
> > > > IMO, trying to optimize a look back period is not the best
approach
> > > > but if you reoptimize frequently enough so your look back
period is
> > > > tuned to the current dominant cycle you likely can achieve better
> > > than
> > > > 30%.
> > > >
> > > > I think a more productive approach is to align your trading
signals
> > > on
> > > > multiple time frames (e.g., daily and weekly).
> > > >
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If your trading system rules are based on things like "buy when
> > > the
> > > > > short term moving ave crosses the long term moving ave".
> > > > >
> > > > > The MA is looking back so many periods to make its calculation
> > > e.g. MA
> > > > > (C,15) is looking back 15 periods.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you test a range of MA periods, to select your best MA
> > > crossover
> > > > > system, then you are optimising the lookback period (at least
> > > that is
> > > > > what I mean).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > brian_z
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Louis Préfontaine"
> > > > > <rockprog80@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brian and everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What exactly do you mean by "optimisation of lookback period"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I had a lot of fun reading this thread. I wonder what is
> > > better:
> > > > > > support/resistance breakout or reversion to mean. Worked
with
> > > > > both; don't
> > > > > > know yet what works better. I've seen people been sure of
> > > their
> > > > > opinions,
> > > > > > but I'd like to read some arguments...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Louis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2008/5/8 brian_z111 <brian_z111@>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's just an opinion, but it is based on observation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm referring to systems designed by optimising lookback
> > > periods.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm happy to be proved wrong ...so you are saying we can
> > > achieve
> > > > > > > better than 30-40%PA, on long term average (through various
> > > market
> > > > > > > cycles) using 'optimisation of lookback period' techniques?
> > > (EOD,
> > > > > no
> > > > > > > leveraging).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > brian_z
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amibroker%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "bilbo0211" <bilbod@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "I will stick to my prediction that around 30%PA EOD
> > > trading is
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > limit for indicators that use lookback periods and
that to
> > > > > achieve
> > > > > > > > more than this requires a different approach (as I say
you
> > > are
> > > > > both
> > > > > > > > correct except I believe that Steve is talking about
>30%PA
> > > > > > > returns)."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is this just your opinion or do you have something that
> > > > > approaches
> > > > > > > > 'scientific proof' of this allegation?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In "The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing" by J M
> > > Hurst,
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > author claims the theoretical maximum annual ROI for
stock
> > > > > trading
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > 2400%. ROI is directly related to the holding period for
> > > each
> > > > > trade
> > > > > > > > and being fully invested at all times (the 'Magic' is in
> > > the
> > > > > power
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > compounding).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hurst recorded the results of a 6 week real time trading
> > > > > experiment
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > which his performance trading high beta stocks approached
> > > his
> > > > > > > > theoretical maximum annual ROI.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hurst waited until the dominant cycles in his trading
> > > instrument
> > > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > in alignment before trading (this is also called multiple
> > > time
> > > > > frame
> > > > > > > > or multiple fractal alignment). He primarily used
daily and
> > > > > weekly
> > > > > > > charts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The theoretical maximum ROI is actually much higher than
> > > 2400%
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > use intraday charts and leveraged trading instruments.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you look in the Amibroker Trading System Yahoo group,
> > > you
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > a poll of results of people's mechanical trading systems.
> > > IIRC,
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > best ones listed returned over 400% per year.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amibroker%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 20 - (- 9.3_ == approx delta 30% PA in my books.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks Yuki for confirming this.
> > > > > > > > > Now I don't have to post a 30% system (as I promised
> > > Louis) to
> > > > > > > prove
> > > > > > > > > my benchmark is correct.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Actually I agree with both you and Steve (the real
> > > problem is
> > > > > > > > > semantics since IMO close analysis would show that most
> > > of us
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > moementum traders and also that most of us are using a
> > > kind of
> > > > > > > S/R in
> > > > > > > > > some way - the difference is how we perceive and define
> > > these
> > > > > > > things).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will stick to my prediction that around 30%PA EOD
> > > trading
> > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > limit for indicators that use lookback periods and
that to
> > > > > > > achieve
> > > > > > > > > more than this requires a different approach (as I say
> > > you are
> > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > > > correct except I believe that Steve is talking about
>30%
> > > PA
> > > > > > > returns).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > (Steve - care to confirm?)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > brian_z
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amibroker%
> > > > > 40yahoogroups.com>, Yuki
> > > > > > > Taga <yukitaga@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Gee, then I guess I should give back my ~20 percent a
> > > year
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > largely based on short-term momentum swings, yes?
(I'm
> > > > > sitting
> > > > > > > plus
> > > > > > > > > > 13 percent YTD this year already, as of yesterday,
> > > versus -
> > > > > 9.3
> > > > > > > > > > percent for my Nikkei 225 benchmark.)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You do have to be agile however. And you cannot
> > > overstay
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > welcome. But the money is there for momentum
systems if
> > > > > > > designed
> > > > > > > > > > and tested properly.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Support" exists, but everyone knows where it is.
> > > Exactly
> > > > > > > where it
> > > > > > > > > > is. And somebody (I'll leave it to you to guess
who) is
> > > > > going
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > ring the bell and tell you that (resistance
failed) or
> > > > > (support
> > > > > > > > > > failed). What are you going to do, then? You're going
> > > to
> > > > > stop
> > > > > > > > > > yourself out of course. With a loser.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Which is likely to be more profitable, and for a
longer
> > > > > period
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > time? Systems that compel you to do the
psychologically
> > > > > > > difficult,
> > > > > > > > > > or systems that suggest that you do the patently
> > > obvious?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone beyond 7th grade that doesn't know
where
> > > > > > > support and
> > > > > > > > > > resistance is? Are there great systems that rely on
> > > widely
> > > > > > > known
> > > > > > > > > > community knowledge?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Look for a system that has good metrics, but a system
> > > that
> > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > suggests that what you need to do will be
> > > psychologically
> > > > > > > difficult
> > > > > > > > > > for you to do, in spite of having back-tested results
> > > > > > > indicating
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > you are foolish if you *don't* do it. Then you are
good
> > > to
> > > > > go,
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > they say. Good to go as long as you do it, of course.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If your system is easy to follow (by that, I mean
that
> > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > psychologically easy for you to make the trades),
it's
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > loser. And vice-versa. The best systems have good
> > > metrics,
> > > > > yet
> > > > > > > > > > despite that they almost defy the trader
> > > (psychologically)
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > the trades. There is no free lunch.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yuki
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thursday, May 8, 2008, 11:50:01 AM, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> Anthony,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> Do yourself a big favor. Don't waste your precious
> > > time
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > s> earth with this kind of drivel. Chasing price with
> > > > > > > momentum
> > > > > > > > > > s> indicators is not going to get you where you
want to
> > > be.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> Coming up with a support/resistance system is all
> > > you
> > > > > need
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > s> whatever you want from the markets.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> I've seen hundreds of traders get wiped out trying
> > > to go
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > path
> > > > > > > > > > s> you're following and all of the successful traders
> > > I've
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > around
> > > > > > > > > > s> in the e-mini futures have used S/R as the
> > > foundation of
> > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > s> trading methodology.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> And, above all, embrace your emotions in trading
> > > because
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > teach
> > > > > > > > > > s> you what you should and shouldn't do going forward.
> > > > > > > Computers
> > > > > > > > > learn
> > > > > > > > > > s> nothing while you learn from every win and loss
you
> > > make.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> Finding an edge in trading is easy. It's only
hard if
> > > > > > > you're
> > > > > > > > > using a
> > > > > > > > > > s> computer to find a needle in a haystack because
you
> > > > > didn't
> > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > s> good enough investment in real-time
observations of
> > > the
> > > > > > > markets
> > > > > > > > > while
> > > > > > > > > > s> researching an edge you'd like to trade.. That
makes
> > > all
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > s> difference in the world for knowing what works and
> > > what
> > > > > > > doesn't.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> You'll come up with 10 edges to trade if you
put the
> > > > > time in
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > s> experience a live market on a regular basis
without
> > > > > trying
> > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > hard.
> > > > > > > > > > s> It will bring out your imagination and
creativity to
> > > find
> > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > you're
> > > > > > > > > > s> looking for.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> I wish someone had told me that 4.5 years ago
when I
> > > > > started
> > > > > > > > > trading
> > > > > > > > > > s> the ER2 e-mini. It would have saved me a lot of
time
> > > > > > > chasing
> > > > > > > > > > s> nonsense.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amibroker%
> > > > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "ihsaham" <ihsaham@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Hai Tomasz,
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> This is simple Jake Bernstein Momentum Formula for
> > > chart
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > s> scanner.
> > > > > > > > > > >> Please help me give arrow buy and sell. Buy
arrow is
> > > > > Green
> > > > > > > > > colour
> > > > > > > > > > s> and
> > > > > > > > > > >> Sell Arrow is Red Colour.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> I really appreciate and thanks for you in advance.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >> Anthony Idic
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> _SECTION_BEGIN(" $ Momentum ");
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> /* Bernstein Momentum Indicator */
> > > > > > > > > > >> /* Set Scaling to Automatic, Show dates On,
Percent
> > > On,
> > > > > > > Middle
> > > > > > > > > On */
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Title = "Bernstein MOM Close - Ref(Close,-7)";
> > > > > > > > > > >> GraphXSpace = 5;
> > > > > > > > > > >> Graph0 = MA(Close - Ref(Close,-7),1);
> > > > > > > > > > >> Graph0Style = 5;
> > > > > > > > > > >> Graph0Color = 29;
> > > > > > > > > > >> Graph1 = MA(Graph0,5);
> > > > > > > > > > >> Graph1Style = 1;
> > > > > > > > > > >> Graph1Color = 32;
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> DaysAgo =Optimize("DaysAgo",-28,-40,-16,4);
> > > > > > > > > > >> Fast = Optimize("Fast", 1, 1,5,1);
> > > > > > > > > > >> Slow = Optimize("Slow",28,16,40,4);
> > > > > > > > > > >> /* Note: It is merely a coincidence that
DaysAgo and
> > > Slow
> > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >> same parameter set. */
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Buy = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Fast),
> > > > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Slow) );
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Sell = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Slow),
> > > > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Fast) );
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Short = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Slow),
> > > > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Fast) );
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Cover = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Fast),
> > > > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo),Slow) );
> > > > > > > > > > >> _SECTION_END();
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|