|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
... And maybe just not posting OT stuff would be an improvement ...
Enough ... since this is now Off Off Topic ... Let's move on ...
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> Of course I don't think TJ should be reviewing every message, and I
> don't think I even hinted at that.
>
> But this used to be more like a *community* years ago. With actual
> *dialog*. Not all of that has been lost, but there sure is a lot
> more roughness to the tone these days.
>
> Even TJ has not been immune. He *roasts* people (who, admittedly,
> post questions they could easily find answers for in a readme) that
> he would have been quite a bit more gentle with a few years ago.
The
> perils of a successful small-business model, I imagine. I don't
know
> how he does it all, and I know I could not.
>
> Anyway, maybe just posting a reply with a subject that includes OT,
> and a "maybe this has drifted OT" might have been better than the
> rhetorical, and clearly sarcastic sounding, even if it wasn't meant
> to be, "What does that or THIS have to do with AB?"
>
> Sorry I suggested you are a list bully. Maybe you just get up on
the
> wrong side of the bed some days. ^_^
>
> Yuki
>
> Friday, December 8, 2006, 9:47:09 AM, you wrote:
>
> F> To the best of my knowledge there is no monitor here outside of
TJ
> F> any more ... If you think his time is better spent reviewing
every
> F> post to see which ones are related to AB as opposed to which
ones
> F> aren't then so be it ... I only try to point folks who seem to
go on
> F> and on with threads that have nothing to do with AB somewhere
> F> else ... Even AB-TS would be a better choice as this is the
place
> F> newbies as well as other come to gain understanding about the
> F> features and functions of AB ... not whether or not they should
be
> F> considering some form of TA, FA or DA ...
>
> F> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Fred,
> >>
> >> The point is well known. And *this* overzealousness is
*precisely*
> >> why Dimitris left this list.
> >>
> >> Yes, OT, and blah, blah, blah. But look at the post that
started
> F> the
> >> mini-war here, Fred. (at least it led to defense, counterpoint,
and
> >> *more* messages, not fewer) It was *yours*. Why did this happen?
> >>
> >> I thought this was a moderated list, so I thought it didn't need
> >> attempts at moderation from anyone other than the moderator.
And I
> >> thought someone other than you was the moderator.
> >>
> >> So, in addition to the question you posed, I'd pose one myself.
> >>
> >> Why would you even bother to take the time to compose the
message
> F> you
> >> did, with the tag comment? It was a small detour, and some
people
> >> like to read. And marked "OT", it's absolutely street legal.
> >>
> >> That ("please mark this OT", which you could have done without
any
> >> sarcasm or additional comment at all) should have been your
*only*
> >> action regarding the subject matter, IMHO.
> >>
> >> You do a hell of a lot of nice things for this forum and
Amibroker,
> >> Fred. But you can be a genuine list bully sometimes, too, for no
> >> good reason that I can see.
> >>
> >> Yuki
> >>
> >> Friday, December 8, 2006, 6:05:52 AM, you wrote:
> >>
> >> F> Non AB related "pearls" are to be found elsewhere ...
> F> Nonsensical or
> >> F> otherwise, politcal commentary too ...
> >>
> >> F> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brpnw1" <tradermail@>
wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> You guys remind me of the Bush Administration in so many ways.
> >> >>
> >> >> ~B
> >> >>
> >> >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sebastiandanconia"
> >> >> <sebastiandanconia@> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I used to cast pearls before swine, too, until I discovered
> F> that
> >> >> some of
> >> >> > the swine had better pearls than I did.:) A word to the
wise:
> >> >> > Over-confidence is a leading indicator of significant
> F> drawdowns.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > S.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brpnw1" <tradermail@>
wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Obviously I am throwing pearls before swine again. Sorry
I
> >> >> misread
> >> >> > > you.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > ~B
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" ftonetti@ wrote:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Presactly ... I tried to make a joke out of it but I
think
> F> it
> >> >> was
> >> >> > > > taken as a typo ...
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sebastiandanconia"
> >> >> > > > <sebastiandanconia@> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > I think what Fred meant was that this is a forum for
the
> >> >> > > practical
> >> >> > > > > application of AB and not for the discussion of
trading
> >> >> > > philosophy,
> >> >> > > > > except as it pertains to demonstrating what AB can do.
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > Luck,
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > Sebastian
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brpnw1"
<tradermail@>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > What does good TA have to do with AB? Do you really
> F> want
> >> F> to
> >> >> > > ask
> >> >> > > > that
> >> >> > > > > > question?
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > ~Bman
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" ftonetti@
> F> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > I agree ... Good T & A is one of my favorite
> >> >> > > methodologies ...
> >> >> > > > but
> >> >> > > > > > > what does that or THIS have to do with AB ?
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Yuki
> >>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Yuki
>
Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/579 - Release Date: 12/7/2006 1:31 PM
|