|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "MarkF2" <feierstein@xxxx> wrote:
> To get into mathematical discussions about this is a waste of time.
> It would require precise definitions and could even degenerate into
> the posting of formal proofs. Is that what this forum is about?
I don't want to make this discussion too long but if you make a
general statement, such as what you did, you also need to explain it
in general terms to hold it as valid.
> Instead, simply make a group in your database with two files of test
> data... one would contain "real" historical data and the second
would
> contain the *price data* (O,H,L,C) from the real file miltiplied by
a
> constant that is not equal to 1. Then put up the original angle
> indicator and toggle back and forth between the two data files if
you
> want a visually compelling example of incoherency. You'll also
have a
> tool to easily test any other theories about which indicators or
> systems are dimensionally coherent.
As Fred already said you should use *log scale* if you want to
mantain the increment rate indipendent from the unit of misure.
Try to plot this
Plot(C, "", 1, 1);
Plot(2*C, "", 1, 1);
in a logaritmic chart and trace the parallel lines. You will have the
same angles.
Franco
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|