|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I take your comments in good humour Dimitri, but I have read of recent formations only being about 40% successful i.e consistent
with what they were supposed to do. Others were completely contrarian, either indicating irregularly or completely the opposite of
what they were supposed to indicate.
I'd therefore suggest a back test count on each before simply accepting them.
P
----- Original Message -----
From: "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:58 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
> Well, well...
> Yuki is trading 30 years, you are 300 year trader, I think it is the
> proper time to move to a newbies rock+roll T/A site...
> DT
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "server not recognized" <winchp@xxxx> wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > Have you checked each candlestick formation because I recall they
> don't work like they did in the 17th century.
> >
> > P
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Tom Supera
> > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:03 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Candlestick-Analyzer
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's my formula for candlestick-detecting, but it's in work and
> also not complete and not optimized.
> > If anyone of you are interested to share and optimize the formula
> with me, i'm happy.
> > After them, i work on a trading system with CCI or MRI, any
> overbought/oversold indicator, volume and the candlestick analyzer.
> > I think it's one of the best way to make a good winning system.
> >
> > Thanks for your help
> >
> > Tom Supera
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
|